rpanons | Idk idc

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I think the term 'within reason' comes into play. The ones I've seen fall short are the attempt to paint Eudio as a homeless mecca, and the bloodwitch rant. Those are the two big ones I remember and I didn't really like them. If you want to stir up trouble, doing it in a consensual game as a game-wide thing just feels like you're trying to get around some of the reasons for being there. "Well, I can't be mad I was taken here against my will, so how else can I have my char bitch?" Sure, have negative cr, but it's going to only be able to be neg to a certain point, otherwise it ruins the whole mood of the game, which is about consent and cuddling. That's what I joined for, not 'How emo can I be today, come watch me flail'.

That isn't the kind of negative CR which would be created by the posts we're looking at, though. I agree with you, those attempts to stir up a wider circle of discontent were out of place, or at least could have been handled better in the second case (in that the player could have used the negative reactions to have the character change their mind rather than digging their heels in). But even in a consent and cuddling game, characters are going to disagree and argue. If that isn't what you're in game to play out, that's fine, that isn't the kind of CR you're going to pursue. But we aren't talking about you.

Mass-disruption is bad.

Minor PA kerfuffles is no big deal and easy to scroll by. The game is big enough to get plenty of what you're looking for.

Even in a cuddle and consent game you're going to have varying personalities which clash. If the intent of the game was to be 100% conflict-free then the volunteers would be brainwashed, or wear shock-collars that buzz them when they say aggro things.

Idk idc

Re: OP

Re: OP

+1