rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-03-29 02:07 pm

Idk idc

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-09 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
No it's more like theirs two toddlers running around and management is sorta trying placate them

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-09 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
okay yeah, that's closer

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-10 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
Glad you agree that both sides are shit

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-10 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
nah i still think gamergaters are the scum of the earth but that doesn't mean i love tumblrinas

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-11 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
you say that like anti's aren't scum of the earth either.

here's a hint, they both are vile

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
No, they really aren't. "Antis" are normal people who see GG bullshit like currently destroying a woman's life for no good reason, and go "holy shit, this is nuts."

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
you say that like the "Antis" haven't done the same exact thing.

or are you forgetting the tittystorm that developed when Jontron let it out he actually supports Goopers.

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
jontron's a dude tho, so he doesn't count

they also think he's white, so to them it's double justified

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
because destroying a woman or poc's life for saying "yanno this shit journos are pulling is nuts" is totally normal

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
"destroying a woman's life"

dunno, she's a total dumbass who dug her grave with her own stupid decisions

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
do you mean alison rapp?

i don't think ayrt was talking about her, i mean she tried to blame gators for losing her job

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
she wants child porn legalized and that pedophiles are victims. her life should be destroyed more. i'm thinking prison time.

sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
*thinks that

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-14 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Stop trying to destroy people's lives. These are not the actions of a good person. JFC.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-14 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm sorry, but when you advocate the decriminalization of child rape, you forfeit the right to be people.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-14 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Who gave you the divine right to impose a sentence on another person? A sentence of the absolute destruction of their life?

I can disagree with someone for having views I find abhorrent. Maybe if they have a position of authority, like being a member of a political party with the capacity to enact law, I might even protest peacefully against them. But a normal and civilised person does not grab a torch, take the time and effort to hunt down where they live, and burn it all down.

You are not a vigilante heroically taking a stand against those who the law cannot touch. You are bringing the entire weight of your militia against one single, unremarkable citizen for what is essentially a thought-crime.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-04-14 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
are you really defending someone who thinks pedophiles are victims of "the system" and child rape should be legal?

really?

are you that far down the radfem rabbit hole?

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 16:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 17:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 17:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 17:33 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 17:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 18:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 18:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 18:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 21:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 03:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 15:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 18:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 03:19 (UTC) - Expand

new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 04:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 04:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 06:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 20:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 21:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 11:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: new anon

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-15 12:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 21:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 21:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 22:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 22:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-04-14 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
you were doing a good job of pretending to be neutral until you used the word "anti", tbh

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
well what are you going to call them because typing anti-goobergate and pro-gushergoop is a pain

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-12 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
call 'em ghazelles

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-13 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
don't couch your points in gamergate's typical rhetoric if you don't want to be associated with them. pretty simple.

also just not getting involved in these conversations if you truly think "both sides" suck.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-04-13 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
ahahaha "typical points"

no one can talk about shitty behavior in the industry anymore without being accused of hating ~all women~

oh you think phil fish is a dick? well you're clearly a misogynist goobergator!

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-04-13 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I literally said rhetoric, but okay. read what you wanna read, I guess.

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-14 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
GG and Everyone Else.

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2016-04-15 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
badpost