socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2025-02-01 09:20 am

we can cuddle and have deep convos about our trauma

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
yeah i just came back too and it's like pulling teeth to get tags these days. threads die off after a single reply. tdms that go nowhere. public games are capped and only open every two months. private games are private games. kind of discouraged.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I have also noticed a lack of tags on large meme communities such as Bakerstreet. It appears that role-playing on Dreamwidth has become increasingly hostile over time. I just want to RP.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
tag out. memes have tons of comments of top levels with no tags. if you tag out often enough you'll get threads.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
*tag out and don't get discouraged.

not everyone will reply but most of us just want to rp, too

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

it's crazy seeing the amount of people who just tl and never budge. ever

tag out, yall

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I do tag out and it’s really hard not to get discouraged when you don’t get an answer back.

I’ll keep trying but I do feel like I’m fighting uphill battle.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
hang in there nonny, may you find someone you click with soon

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
most public games aren't capped and the ones that are capped aren't at the limit. i'm not sure what the complaint that tdms "go nowhere" is about considering many tdms stay active for a while. it sounds more like you have high standards or a specific niche interest that you're not seeing anywhere.

just because there aren't any games that you want to join or meme threads that you want to tag doesn't mean that dwrp is dying. try expanding your horizons.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
anon i didn’t say dwrp is dying. I’m agreeing with the sentiment that it seems stagnant. i tag out on bakerstreet and for four tag outs i get one reply then get ghosted or it takes over a week to get something back. on the tdm situation i posted, got two replies then one person never replied back and the other replied not enough times for me to be able to use our thread for the game’s application. the juice has not been worth the squeeze. i’m a ‘fast tagger’ in the sense that i want more than a single reply every week. i want momentum. i have no niche interest this is all gen stuff

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
why didn't you tag out on the tdm? posting a top level and expecting people to give you enough samples to apply only works if you have a lot of friends who want to tag in. most of the time it's a good idea to tag out plenty of times on a tdm as well, especially if you're new to the game.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
it was a while ago and at the time i was the only person on the tdm. couldn’t tag others because there were none

my point is I literally tag out all the time and i feel like i’m putting in a lot of effort for 1/4 of results. hard not to be discouraged

da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
what sorts of characters do you play? and have you tried more than one tdm?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
video games and tv shows. and yes i have. the second one got me no replies but i did tag out. and yes i made sure my top level was engaging and gave people choices.

dda

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I was going to ask if your journal is filled out with info, only because sometimes I skip over people who tl if they have blank journals mainly because I don't know anything about the character so I wouldn't know if my character would get on well with them. But most of those have been people who don't actually give options to tag into for their TLs so I must not have stumbled across any of yours yet. Maybe someday!

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
oh yeah i have a custom layout with permissions and a link to the character's bio from the main fansite. i know you have to be proactive i have no problems with that. i'm just the kind of person who gets easily frustrated when i feel my efforts are not yielding fruit. oh well. i'll keep trying. thanks anon.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
are you dark?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
no way youre asking this when ayrt has been perfectly coherent and lucid

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 18:46 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
you were tagging on a tdm where you were literally the only top level? you probably need to pick better tdms to post on, anon.

sorry to +1 this but

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
> the only person on the TDM

well there's your problem

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
the problem is that i'm new to dwrp so i don't know how to spot 'better' tdms. to this day i don't know if that game was slow, cliquey or dying.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
im ngl if you mean there was literally one comment and it was your toplevel and not that you just didnt see anyone else around that you wanted to tag, then that isnt a dwrp problem, its a That Game problem

if youre new and youre comfortable with dropping a sock comment im sure me and some of the old hands on here would be willing to reach out and give you some feedback

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
but you were willing to blame the whole of dwrp for it? ok.

look at [plurk.com profile] dwrp to find tdms to tag to. there have been lots of them recently and all of them seem busy.

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
anon did not blame all of dwrp calm down

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
>dwrp plurk
>last post made over a month ago

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:04 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

yet another da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: yet another da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 23:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: yet another da

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 23:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 20:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 02:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 08:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-03 22:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-02-04 03:54 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-02-03 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, if op was the only person on the tdm it's pretty clear the problem was not op and sad rather that no one was interested in that game.