rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2023-02-02 09:54 pm

if ur breath were baited, it would smell fishy

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:


Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-22 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I also put in an app. I hope there's enough that we have a game. There is a lot going on and it's pretty complicated but I think if there's enough of a playerbase willing to commit it could get off the ground. It's a really ambitious premise and I think more interesting setups like this for a smaller group of players could be a good development for DWRP as a whole.
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
what's with the doom and gloom anons hanging out in this thread?

chill, they're open until the 28th. the mod not updating the comment doesn't mean the game is dead.

starting to feel like some anons just want this game to be doa so they're acting like it's already a done deal
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
unfortunately a game can be pretty and interesting and have mods who seem excited but still flop if it can't get enough interested players which may be what's happening here. i had people interested in it on my plurk timeline but a lot of them bailed once another game tdm went up that they were more into. they were interested in the seasons powers game more than a space game.

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
da

It didn't help that I was trying to voice test a character and the sample wanted 10 comments just from me for the application, so the combination of no traction on the TDM + a large sample requirement means even if I did write an app it wouldn't get accepted, so I just gave up.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
i think possibly some people are rushing to the DOA conclusion because a lot of games opened and closed rapidly last year, and it's become more common for games to have an extremely short lifespan.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 02:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I had a rough couple of days but I'm planning to send in an app soon. The blank app comment was scaring me, tbh.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
this (screened apps but the mod takes a long time to update the received apps comment or never does) has been a problem at multiple games lately and makes me wonder why so many games still default to screened apps. are that many people worried about posting a public app?

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
as an app mod elsewhere, I prefer screened apps so we can process out of order in case we need to wait for someone canon familiar or otherwise to be online. people get bitchy if you go out of order for any reason unscreened.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-23 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
as a player: is less embarrassing if there's a revision or decline. help prevent app plagiarism (an extremely minor concern, but, i appreciate the privacy and option for choice if i want to additionally put my app out there in my journal for public reference or keep it to myself. really the only other people who need to see any app are game mods).

as a mod: it lets me process apps out of order if i need a second opinion, permits me the option to make a hard choice if we're near a game cap without accusations of favoritism or whatever, permits me to pre-screen problematic players and privately decline them if needed (which is very rare).

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
ngl screened apps is an instant back button for me. if i can't see how potential castmates interpret their characters, i'm not going to waste the time and effort on an app only to find out that we have completely differing interpretations of canon.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
You can usually see the app on the character journal anyway, if the game allows for linked apps.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
in that case i'd just check the game comms, character inboxes, character profiles etc. it's very rare to find someone who doesn't have at least an app, inbox or info pages in their journal if they're actively playing in a game.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 10:27 am (UTC)(link)
could take it the other direction -- i'm not convinced a received apps comment is necessary? like...is it to make sure you don't app someone already apped to a game that doesn't allow challenges? there are easier ways to handle that.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
ime it's usually because players demand one so they can keep track of apps coming in and get excited or wank about it depending on how they're feeling
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
"it doesn't look great"

eh, only to people who judge games based on little things like this. not everyone cares this much or they're willing to give mods more of a benefit of the doubt. you're assuming that everyone in dwrp expects 100% professionalism and availability from mods at all times, which isn't true.

personally i don't think it makes a difference if this mod chooses to update it or not as long as the rest of the game runs ok.

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
DA; while I'd like to give the mod(s) the benefit of doubt I feel like this comment will age poorly if the app round ends up not being processed after all

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)
they probably just forgot about the app list comment while managing everything else. has anyone actually told them so instead of bitching about it not being updated here?
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
da

interesting how the tone of this comment implies that all mods are equally aware of what a game "should" look like and also how many people in dwrp as a whole are dissatisfied with their apps not being worth anything

anons here really will reach for any excuse to blame mods for all of their problems
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:36 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:41 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:42 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:31 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:48 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:56 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:41 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 17:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 18:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 18:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 17:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 17:53 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 14:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 15:11 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 15:35 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 15:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:34 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:42 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 17:07 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 19:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:18 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 20:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 17:37 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 13:35 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-24 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2023-02-25 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Majority Rule

(Anonymous) 2023-02-24 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
They've been responding within a day or so to any comments on both plurk and their journals from what I've seen. I don't think the moderator team isn't excited, motivated, or available. Like the other anon downthread I think they probably just forgot to update the application comment since everything else is getting timely responses and updates.

I do think that there doesn't seem to be much of a potential player base, though. There's a few people tagging but it doesn't seem like the initial interest for the game is going to translate into people actually joining? I saw on plurk there's only three applications in. I'm still working on mine because I'm slow.