socksuke_uchiha (
socksuke_uchiha) wrote in
rpanons2021-04-29 11:12 am
sorry that people are sick of your majestic mcus
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES
KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES
KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)no one said you can't like rwby or whatever other canon. but the fact of the matter is much of the fandom was alienated by INCREDIBLY poor writing decisions and they even completely tanked certain characters for no logical reason at all (cough ironwood cough)
all this hyperdefensiveness is a huge turn-off to a potential player. not really a way convince someone to play from your canon tbh.
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)the nature of the project during its early years guaranteed that there would be a lot of writing stumbles, and yeah there sure are a lot of those, but ironwood's arc ain't one of them.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)the point is moot anyway because lol if you think op is touching this now. chasing someone off because you refuse to concede the show MIGHT have a consistency issue = bad look. nobody even said it was the very worst ever but damn if y'all aren't making it seem that way.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:59 am (UTC)(link)"you refuse to concede consistency issues!!!"
okie
imo the entire series, writing included, has vastly improved in seasons 6-8 though it isn't without continuing issues. this also isn't an unpopular opinion. i'm not sure what kind of reaction y'all want to elicit from "lmao OP isn't touching it now lmao lmao" like, i'm not ashamed of politely disagreeing with you.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 01:21 am (UTC)(link)if it pings op, they'll probably look into it further, if not they won't, it's that simple
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)In season 2, he shows up to a festival/tournament that celebrates an armistice agreement (for a war his country started) with a full military fleet without warning anyone ahead of time that he's going to.
In season 3, he meddles with the politics of a foreign country to go over the head of another character (who's supposed to be a close friend and ally of his) to try to implement policies Ironwood thinks is right.
In season 4, he closes his country's borders and stops all exports of an important resource. He does this without getting approval from the other people in his country's ruling council.
He's not around in seasons 5 or 7.
In season 7 it becomes clear that his decision to close the borders and ban exports is causing a lot of grief and tension for the working class in his country. He also reroutes valuable resources that could help the city to an important secret project without explaining why, orders a political rival arrested, and bans public gatherings. At the end of the season he declares martial law and tries to have the main characters arrested for defying him. Season 8 is all about him escalating his behavior further and further to try to control the situation.
A lot of Ironwood stans argue that because he had good intentions in doing all of this him being such a monster in the last season is unreasonable, but that's always been the entire point of his character. He's someone that's willing to go to unreasonable extremes to do what's 'right', but he won't listen to any input about what counts as the right thing to do or what the best way to achieve it is.
To reiterate, his very first scene in the series is him showing up with his military fleet, his allies telling him why it's a bad idea, and Ironwood blowing them off because he thinks he's right. Anyone that thinks the tracks for this weren't laid from the start wasn't paying attention.
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)congrats, op isn't going to touch RWBY now, if that was your intention then good job i guess
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)i get that a lot of people don't like rwby and they want to make sure we all know about it, but this was a really inappropriate place to barge in with made-up stuff about how they're not wlw really and people only rp the men. especially when OP already mentioned some actual flaws in the initial rec.
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Because yeah, sorry to say it, but that does come across as defensive. RWBY has some solid strengths. Stellar writing is not one of them.
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-07 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)to other anon, sorry i don't have any vids or essays to link. i don't engage with that stuff because i find most of them espouse deliberately controversial takes for views and they tend to put them out very quickly after a divisive season or episode airs, before those slowburn beats actually come to fruition over many seasons. in the long run they are actually not very good analyses of the writing, imo.
(which i agree IS flawed in many ways, just to reiterate.)
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:20 am (UTC)(link)I feel this way about these types of videos in general. You're a good person, Ironwood Anon
"ironwood anon"
Re: F/F friendly characters/canons?
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 08:37 am (UTC)(link)thanks! this was great.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-08 12:35 am (UTC)(link)