rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-06-13 06:38 pm

ゴメンナサイ

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not saying people should go be best friends with her. i'm sure she has done some weird shit. but, having been friends with some fucked up "victims" in the past, i'm not going to jump on the hate train without more concrete proof of what was supposedly done. not saying that's what happened here, but there's enough doubt in my mind for that to register as an option.

if nobody has that solid proof, that's fine. shit happens. the world continues to turn.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
thats your opinion and youre welcome to it but nobody is obligated to give proof to a bunch of strangers so what we have is whats here and some people would rather be safe than sorry.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
aaand that's fine. but if those deets are going to be kept on lockdown, nobody should be surprised or offended when some people go "ok but i don't really 100% believe this."

good to know we're on the same page.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
thats fine

but it's still pretty tactless to look at this and insinuate they could've been in a relationship or something. if you don't think its a big deal then fine but don't throw shade at the person who did to discredit them.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
...? they could have been for all i know, though? i don't see how that's such an offensive question to have when the topic of visiting and sex between rp partners comes up.

DA

(Anonymous) 2016-06-23 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
i knew both of them during the time all that went down and they definitely weren't. ashley was always pushy about begging for selfies and voice recordings from the other person but i don't have caps or pastebins of those plurks, so /shrug

da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
can you stop whiteknighting embarrassingly for your friend now

you're not going to convince anybody to believe her word over her victims' when the latter have two modteams backing them

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, okay, cry whiteknight because someone doesn't immediately agree with you. because that always works out.

dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-23 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
youre not voicing a what-if argument if you're pulling maybes out of your ass. seeing that she harassed someone with sexual messages shouldn't be met with trying to suggest they could have been in a relationship if the other person is obviously expressing discomfort. the fact that she tried to app into this person's cast and then tried to play the victim when they got her banned says a lot to her character. the entire spiel is very But What About Me and the other party didn't pursue her trying to get her banned everywhere, just the space they were in.

believe what you want but don't try to invent reasons why that shit would be okay.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-23 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
all i'm saying is i'm not willing to demonize someone over ~implications~ and he-said-she-said bullshit, especially when we don't know the relationship between these two people.

sorry that triggers you, i guess.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-23 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
LOL. HOLY SHIT. "SORRY THAT TRIGGERS YOU."

get out of her sjws omg!!!!!! cant believe ur offended by dumbassness!!

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-23 07:20 am (UTC)(link)
They literally said they were not in a relationship nor were they friends so we did know the relationship between them. It was nonexistent.

Try to learn how to read and then come back when you've pulled your head out of your ass.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-22 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
The games in question are really small so it shouldn't be surprising that people aren't posting the direct deets everywhere.