rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-06-13 06:38 pm

ゴメンナサイ

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
we get it. you hate dubcon and noncon.

now who's making assumptions?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
they said flat-out they don't have a permissions post and they never said no noncon-dubcon

they never said yes either. that's pretty fucking important to playing any kink. not saying "no" does not automatically equal a "yes".

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
anime or game?

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
i don't see why you just haven't put up a permissions post yet. as someone else said, even that master has done it

i'm not trying to shame you or anything like that, but i am still aware that i've only got one side of the story here. why you brought this to rpa instead of just asking them i can't even begin to imagine

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
when in rome, anon...

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
check out the projection on this guy, holy shit

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
because we regularly talk ooc already...? if you want to do noncon with me then just ask me right there while we're chatting or while we're setting things up or something

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
No, it doesn't. And if their partner had sprung rape on them, I'd be right in the crowd with you tarring and feathering them

but they haven't. this isn't kayvin with his predatory lesbians or selwyn dropping trou and flat-out begging for rapecock. this is, until we get proof to the contrary, two rpers misfiring on each other. maybe op's partner wants rape. maybe they don't. maybe they don't even want smut

the point is, if both players were communicating none of this would be a problem. both, not just op and not just mystery partnernon.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
I enjoy modding more than playing, as a sub mod not a head mod, but these days everyone expects you to play in a game if you want to mod there.

There are lots of good reasons for that, but it kinda bums me out.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
Do you talk in a public space like Plurk where all your friends can read it? Maybe that's why they're dancing around it (if they are dancing around it)

I don't know, anon. I can only play devil's advocate here.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
uh

they do?

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
so you definitely just spring up rape on every rper who doesn't explicitly tell you they dislike it, regardless of thread setup or character dynamic. got it
wankgator: leviamon [digimon] (there can only be one)

[personal profile] wankgator 2016-06-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Who would want to seduce someone who's said he'd bang his own daughter?

Re: Resident Evil

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
they played wesker, which i guess is kind of ironic considering their world views. i can't remember either account but i know she was itsgametime/timetogame (igticons or something?) on lj and i believe she was in that terrible exitvoid cast.

glad she's gone but she didn't scare anyone away. a lot of people keep to themselves and some are in it only for m/m (there's this one really bad chris that seems to stick to sex games so they don't get called out on how ooc they are for example) or only want to play with their friends. i know there have been a few really nasty ooc weskers other than phase that shared the same kind of world views, too. a lot don't seem open to cross canon shenanigans even when they're in games and i think it's a reputation gained over time for the series. i know some people who play from it and they're good people but i can't speak for anyone who crawls out of the wood work.

if phase is still around she probably has new accounts and a handle but you should be fine, anon.

Re: FAVOURITES

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Haise is really cute. Having fun with Achilles as always! A lot of people are pretty great right now and I'm happy that the app line is getting into hand again!

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
we mostly talk in pms and ims sometimes

i don't know either. we'll see

dddda

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
op shouldn't have to be the first one to say "by the way, I don't want to play noncon/dubcon". given the nature of the kink, the responsibility to ask is on OP's partner, not them. you don't just assume someone is okay with any kink until they say otherwise. and no, consensual sex does not count as a kink that needs to be asked about first. they are two completely different worlds and your attempts to conflate them come of as disingenuous, and dare I assume, projecting.

basically, you need to pick a position, either noncon/dubcon is a default or it's not, you can't play this devil's advocate "both sides are wrong" nonsense with a topic like this.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
don't play devil's advocate. it only leads to you looking like a jackass.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
yup, anon, you caught me red-handed. i'm the rape bandit, i prowl memes for the softest, most gen players i can and then i sneakily cadge them into playing with me

i lull them into a false sense of security, make them think it's gonna be all sweetness and coffeeshops, and then BAM I spring the chains and dildos and shove my character's butt in their character's face, demanding they shove their cock into it!

and if they don't, i spam them with goatse until they flee in terror

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
okay i see what's going on. you're talking about this very specific situation op brought. in which case, yes, it is conjecture on our part to assume that their partner is pushing for noncon/dubcon without communicating as such beforehand. i was reading this portion of the discussion on more general terms, as in when it actually is being forced on someone, and not just as one of a variety of potential reasons for the way in which op's partner is playing.

i do agree that op should be communicating with their partner instead of us. all we can do is speculate. actually, everyone should fucking communicate. can we get that on a t-shirt? "have you communicated with your rp partner today?"

Re: Resident Evil

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
that's one of the problems, too. horror doesn't have to be "scary" and even as a kid i didn't really think they were scary.

if they did i think the classic elitists would love it but it would do poorly because it'd just be the same thing again and again.

i'm curious to see what they do but from what i hear it's all new characters and i didn't like the style outside of first person. re has always looked way better than most other games so seeing that mannequin uncanny valley gloss is really jarring. i'm not invested in anything i've heard and even if they announced any familiar characters i'm still not sure i'd buy it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
yeah. this very specific situation is all i'm talking about. idk where people pulled the "oh you're saying it's okay for thirsty rape players to spring their thirsty rape on people huh?!?!" from

it's funny how this whole conversation went astray for the exact same reason op came to us. maybe i wasn't clear enough laying it out. if so, i sincerely apologize to anyone i offended.

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
look for a game that's new/unopened and advertising for mods? if they're modding anon, it's not like they'll know if you app in once the game gets started, right?
liongoddess: (Sweet)

[personal profile] liongoddess 2016-06-16 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
*flies!!!*

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-06-16 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
we only have one side of the story here, anon. if someone doesn't try to see things from the other point of view, what's the point of this conversation except to circlejerk?

op, if you're cool with it, it'd be cool to get a follow-up on this when you find out. i must admit i'm curious as to whether all the other anons in here are right and i'm just not seeing something that's obvious to everyone else in here