rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2014-07-06 05:42 am

Um

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: CONSIGNMENT

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes and I will qualify it as being an issue with wank in particular. I have no problem with NPC interactions and consequences of things my character may say or do, I'm all for IC actions having IC consequences and wish it happened more often in games.

What I do have an issue with are people being wanked on before they even get in a game unless they are well known issues. It feels like every tag is looked at because "anon on wg said they suck so let me see" or "anon said I suck so how do I know if I tag this person they'll want to give me the chance to prove anon wrong, should I even try?" or "well how do I know I'm not next on the hate list?"

It's a lot of pressure when all you want to do is have fun playing in a game and I wouldn't be surprised to see people dropping just because the environment feels so hateful.

+1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: CONSIGNMENT

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry anon wanked on you brosis

but maybe if people ignored the dumb wank rather than taking the bait (see: q's player crying about it, rapunzel's friends rushing in making idiots of themselves even when that wank was incredibly weak) it wouldn't be such an issue. of course whiteknighting, drawing attention to it, and just continuing to act like a moron which inspired said wank is going to drag it out, what else were you expecting? if you write dumb yaoi love letters and shit out dick poetry in morse code, yes, you'll get side-eyed, how is that news?

cdc's environment is no more toxic than any other new big game that's opened up. you are definitely being paranoid and if you're dropping "because it feels so hateful" we probably are better off without you. ignore it, tag, and have fun. that's what most of us are doing.

Re: CONSIGNMENT

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't really get this, tbh. i read wankgate and rpanons all the time, but honestly the cdc threads aren't that bad. there's a lot of comments, sure, but it's a whole lotta nothin most of the time. not any worse than standard. i've been in games with way more actual vitriol and done just fine

anons need to take a chill pill across the board if you ask me

+1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
there's so much shaking and crying going on in this thread over wank and idgi because your wank is weak as fuck

other games have had people threatening to call the fbi/doxxing/gorespam within the past year, meanwhile consignment's sitting in a pile of "someone said a mean thing about me on the internet"