rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2018-10-20 10:50 pm

generously pack butt with peanuts & carrots

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER

Re: DUPLICITY

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't hate them because they're problematic, i hate them because they suck. not everything needs to be a tumblr debate, jan.

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Personally, I get people sticking up for Twilight, but 50 Shades’ bad first person writing is so blatantly grating enough that even that alone puts it firmly into “the only entertainment value in this book is making fun of it” territory for me.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
So many movies and books are bad though. What makes this one so much worthier of hate than anything else?

When you hate on the film, you're attacking one of only two movies that were aimed at women that entire year. Think about it.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:24 pm (UTC)(link)
don't do that. don't equate 'aimed at women' as being worthy of anything special. that's like calling any female who didn't vote for clinton a traitor to their gender.

just because it's 'aimed' at a demographic doesn't exempt it from being a shoddy piece of work.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying the opposite, that it's specifically *hated* because it's aimed at women and that it should be treated the same as everything else. There are plenty of contemporaries which are just as bad, if not worse. They get forgotten. Female-aimed things get hated hard and ridiculed and mocked for years.

Look at pop culture: Twilight, 50 Shades, Mortal Instruments, Magic Mike, One Direction, Justin Bieber, The Beatles, THE COLOR PINK. It's crazy.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
that's mostly because they're shitty and shittily done. and you're naming a small handful of things, which is asinine, since that shifts the original argument you had of 'within the last year'. i'm also going to argue the whole beatles thing and pink actually started out as a color for boys, so...

fact check yourself and stay to one argument.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Because young girls started deliberately hating pink this century because it was a boy color...

Don't be deliberately dumb, anon.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

This is really damn true, and it's been going for more than just decades. IIRC, some oldschool intellectuals from the XIX century openly said that women should not be allowed to read novels because they were too stupid to distinguish fiction from reality. Which sounds suspiciously simnilar to the shit that purity-obsessed "fandom police" idiots say right now.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there's a difference between "women are unable to distinguish fiction from reality" and "people's attitude's are often shaped by the media they consume."

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-24 21:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-24 21:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 11:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 19:57 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 20:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 02:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you. It's misogynist female-hating trash and I'm so done with it.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
why are you acting like only female interests get this treatment and not male interests too?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-25 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
Can you name some though???

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-26 07:45 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-26 08:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-26 16:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-26 20:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right that there's a lot of inherent misogyny in what things in particular get SO MUCH hatred, but you can't just say everyone who hates something does so for that reason and not because whatever it is just objectively sucks.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
okei

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-27 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
You think The Beatles get hated and mocked? Are you stupid?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-27 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
not that anon, but yeah, they did, especially in the early 60s. there was an almost immediate and aggressive backlash against the beatles when they first got huge in america, in particular, and not just from concerned parents who hated all rock n roll, but from the american ultra-macho rockabilly scene as well.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-28 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-28 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
man i'm not even like a music history buff or whatever but even i know that beatlemania came with more than its fair share of backlash

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Being one of two movies aimed at women makes it even WORSE, not better, because it's taking advantage of girls and women who don't have a whole lot of other options and pushing a narrative about how an unhealthy relationship is the ideal romance.

Sure, other movies and books do the exact same thing, but that makes them just as shit as Twilight.

+100000000

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
This right here. My 16 year old cousin loved 50 Shades and was in love with Grey. Every time I visited she'd just gush about him being perfect.

I tried to hint that he was an asshole and emotionally abusive, but her blinders were firmly stuck. And guess what? Her first real boyfriend was emotionally abusive and an asshole.

It's trash fam.

Re: +100000000

(Anonymous) 2018-10-25 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
So now we have to protect women from problematic content in case they misunderstand it? Jesus...

Re: +100000000

(Anonymous) 2018-10-25 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
More like "it's trash and people dislike it for a legitimate reason rather than just because it's for women", but sure

Re: +100000000

(Anonymous) 2018-10-25 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
i think this is why children shouldn't be reading books meant for adults

not because it's "mature" but because a child doesn't know what's healthy and what isn't unless a responsible parent has taught them beforehand.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2018-10-25 22:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
being aimed at women doesn't make them worthy of respect alone.

if they're shit, they're fucking shit. 50 shades is fucking garbage and women deserve better.

(Anonymous) 2018-10-24 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
who gives a shit if it's "aimed at women"? women deserve better fucking movies than that trilogy of bile. raise your goddamn standards. jesus.

AYRT

(Anonymous) 2018-10-25 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not talking about other bad things, though. I'm talking about one bad thing, and other things being bad doesn't make the 50 Shades book not horrendously badly written.

I'm also not hating on the film, TBH. I went to see it with a group of friends who wanted to hatewatch it and... I actually kind of liked it. I know it's been said before, but it being a film stripped away the whole "oh god, the writing is so bad" thing, they tweaked a number of cringey moments to feel more understandable or actually romantic, and I found it well-acted.