21 days after journal entry
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES
MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 07:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 07:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-03 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 07:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-02 12:41 am (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2016-06-02 06:07 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-02 15:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 06:28 am (UTC)(link)You can still read Drift Fleet stuff, it's not locked.
Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-30 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-31 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 12:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-01 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)i'll forever state just because something says it's feminist doesn't mean it is regarding movies like sucker punch but i found fury road stood up
Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-05 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)Furiosa and the wives really don't get anything done without Nux or Max around, gets one of the wives killed due to her...I don't even want to call it a plan since it was 11% of a concept really. Furiosa's only real skill is driving, which....well Nux matches and Max exceeds by a large margin. As soon as the going gets tough one of them tries to abandon the plan and what not. Basically without the two mens The Wives and Furiosa would of just been food for the bitter earth within a day.
the argument that it's a feminist movie is that the main plot is about empowering and freeing women which makes it more about womens' right and empowerment then it anything to do with Feminism (especially the 3rd wave), but that's a whole other argument about the current and former state of Feminism.
Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-05 16:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-05 18:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 11:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 02:50 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 04:45 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 11:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 00:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 00:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 03:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:10 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 03:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-11 07:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-01 23:56 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I know it’s a bit confusing, because we’re so used to seeing stories about sexists told by sexists. We’re so used to sexism being portrayed by sexist male filmmakers for the sake of a sexist male audience, that we’ve been fooled into thinking this is the only way sexism even can be portrayed.
eabevella’s review of MMFR pointed out that the villains never call women “bitches,” nor are they shown overtly leering at the women in the film, and took this as evidence that the villains in the movie are not sexist. That they objectify women, but only in the way that they objectify everything, and their objectification is in fact quite egaitarian.
While the assessment that the villains are not shown leering or spitting gendered slurs is correct, I’m going to go ahead and say that the conclusion eabevella drew from this is wrong, wrong, so very wrong.
See, there’s a great lie we’ve been told – that in order for an audience to understand that a character is sexist, women must be humiliated on camera.
The truth is this:
When a male character calls a female character a bitch in a movie, that is not the filmmaker’s way of showing the audience the character is sexist; that is the filmmaker’s way of showing the audience that the character’s sexist point of view is worth hearing.
Read that paragraph over and over until it sinks in.
Mad Max: Fury Road makes it absolutely clear that the villains are sexist, and it does so without ever once implying that their sexist point of view is worth hearing. Instead, we learn that they are sexist second-hand, through context and world-building.
We see that the wives have been dressed in ridiculous, impractical gauze bikinis. We see that the wives are not only young and healthy, but also model-pretty. Through these subtle details, the narrative makes it clear that Immorten Joe, the villain, chose these women not just as useful stock, but as sexual objects in which he took sexual pleasure.
In contrast, when the movie introduces the audience to the wives, the movie makes sure to portray them in as humanized, and non-sexualized a manner as possible. Even when they are literally bathing together, we don’t see any water running down chests while the models arch their backs and run their fingers through their hair and sigh pleasurably. Instead we see a bunch of women perfunctorily rinsing off legs and feet, looking exhausted. When they see Max for the first time, they take on fearful, closed off expressions, and project fearful, closed off body language.
Compare this to, for example, Theon Greyjoy’s castration in HBO’s Game of Thrones. We know he was castrated, even though no one ever says the word “castration” and the camera never shows a penis being lopped off. The filmmakers manage to convey that the mutilation has taken place, but respect the character enough not to make a lurid scene out of it (and yet proceed to make lurid scenes out of every possible denigration and mutilation of every possible female character they can cram into their commercial free timeslot).
.
As for Imperator Furiosa, it is hard for us, the audience, to not see Charlize Theron as a beautiful woman. But when we compare her appearance in the movie to that of the wives, it’s clear to see that Imperator Furiosa is, in fact, the opposite of what Immorten Joe and his war mongering culture view as desirable, beautiful, or womanly. They do not sexually objectify her because to them she is sexless.
If we ignore our own biased understanding of Furiosa – as a character that a beautiful actress is portraying – and instead immerse ourselves in the culture of the Miller’s world, it becomes obvious that Furiosa has taken great pains to make herself genderless under the villains’ gaze, and that her efforts have succeeded.
From Entertainment Weekly:
It was Theron herself who unlocked the image of the androgynous warrior—a woman who has escaped the fate of other women by erasing her gender.
“I just said, ‘I have to shave my head,’” Theron recalls. Furiosa is a war-rig operator living in a place where all other females have been enslaved as breeding and milking chattel. But Furiosa is barren and therefore of no value to the despot Immortan Joe and his soldiers. She is considered worthless. ”They almost forget she’s a woman, so there is no threat,” she says. “I understood a woman that’s been hiding in a world where she’s been discarded.” [x]
.
The villains in the movie are absolutely misogynist. They are absolutely sexist. They do absolutely view beautiful women as sexual objects that exist purely for the male gaze.
But the movie is not about them.
The movie, instead, portrays sexist men as obstacles for the heroes of the movie to overcome.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-05 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-06-05 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-05 20:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-05 20:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 01:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 04:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 16:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 00:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 00:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-05 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-05 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-06 01:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) 2016-06-06 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)I've literally not heard one peep of anyone "disowning" the movie. Maybe buy a little less into your own hype.
Re: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-07 01:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: MAD MAX: FURY ROAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-06-08 19:44 (UTC) - Expand