rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-05-03 11:35 am

You sound fat

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
because i'm against people trying to take something away because they don't approve of it. it's censorship. the main rule for all of these places is to just avoid them if you don't like them. there are plenty of people on the site that have no notion of either of these comms. there's also people that prefer to just go to rpa and avoid the negativity of wg. if you don't want to go, don't, but arbitrarily deciding that because you don't like it and it's negative, it shouldn't be allowed on the comm is the problem i have. take responsibility for your own actions. realize that you can't control the assholes. that's fine. no one expects you to. but this isn't YOUR neighborhood to police. let the filth wallow in itself. stay out of it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
lmao it is not censorship. no one is stopping you from saying any of this shit. learn what censorship means, my god.

if closing anoncomms means losing a whiner like you, good riddance.

btw, I don't want them around because they're "negative", I don't want them around because outside of you and whatever last hold out of people here that aren't just trolls, they're useless and meaningless.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt's idea of censorship really just means having to own their own words

i would bet a week's pay they're the kind of person who is all sweet words to someone's face and then they go to wankgate and badmouth them with relish

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
lmao at "it's censorship"

just staying away from it doesn't do shit, though. people won't play with you if you're getting dropped. you can be kept out of games or have games fail because you're in them. i'd be fine with "just ignore it" if it had no other effects, but it does.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
but anon you don't understand!

they toughed it out and pulled up their internet bootstraps so everyone else should too!

dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
I'd be glad to if I could figure out who the fuck my grudgewanker is.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
you wouldn't even have to worry about a grudgewanker if there weren't anoncomm platforms for them to jerk it off from

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, they've existed since before the 24/7 anoncomms. That's how fucking determined they are.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
getting ride of anoncomms would certainly kill one of their platforms, at least.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
>'getting rid of this thing would get rid of your thing'.
>'not really, no'.
>'... it would so.'

MY WAY IS THE ONE TRUE WAY.

don't you have a child to sacrifice to the lord of light?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
except that there's been no "not really" and instead just rampant shitposting and a dash of "wah CENSORSHIP!"

getting rid of this thing would not solve the problem overnight. but it would definitely be a start

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
not really, no

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
didn't say it would get rid of it, but it would certainly make it more difficult for them to do so.

fucking pay attention, you magnesium tablet.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
are you really losing out on anything if you're getting ignored by assholes who believe everything they read on wg, though? i'd think they'd be doing you a favor.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
did you just miss treegate entirely or

everyone reads wg. even the people who hate it and everything it stands for read it because it's the only way to be sure some gang of psychotic internet obsessives isn't stirring shit about you behind your back

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
i love how you're tossing out old instances which, btw, was universally condoned as far as wg's response to a troll (and the site as a whole) as some kind of proof. that went around because of the content, with people outright stating, 'i don't actually read wg, but someone told me this was (thing) and so i did and omg'.

now, we know that most of the 'i don't usually read wg, but' are lies, but there were people i know that never went to anon comms that saw treegate, so that's the shittiest of all shitty examples.

not everyone reads wg. not everyone wants to. not everyone needs to. but if something big like that happens? it gets linked around.

are you sure you didn't miss treegate?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
i love how you try to dismiss it as a one-off instance and somehow maintain the fantasy that all of dwrp just paid attention that one time but the rest of the time they don't care honestly!

i mean, do you just live in your own little world? your perfect world where our numbers are still here and no one cares about wg but assclowns and namedrops don't have any effect at all on people's rp prospects? is that the world you live in? because if it is, fuck, i've got money, sign me up for a ticket. i'd like to live in that world.

unfortunately that's not the world me or the rest of dwrp have to live in

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
oh, right, it's only a minority that cares about wankgate. that must be why almost every game that's tried to open this year has gotten wanked out of existence, and most of the remainder are on life support.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
if you think wg has anything to do with the games not taking off... i have a bridge you might be interested in.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
i love how the people pissed off about dragon called can't shut up about it yet every chance they get they swear that wg had nothing to do with their game closing, their mod was just sucked into the land of oz!

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
i'm sorry, was a natural disaster supposed to be your proof or something?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
as excuses go, "got sucked into a tornado" ranks up there with "drunk at a party" on the believability scale

and even if she really was transported to oz, i presume she still has her phone. why would this kill the game and not just delay it?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
because so far no one's heard back from her. meaning she could be injured. meaning that a game on the internet is the last thing she's concerning herself with. or she could have family injured. or dealing with a destroyed home.

sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 07:25 am (UTC)(link)
she lives in florida. around the time she went mia, there was a pretty big storm/tornado. do the m... i'm not saying that word. but do it.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:40 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-24 07:54 (UTC) - Expand

anon that ayrt replied to

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
this isn't about dragon called. i don't give a shit either way about dragon called. there's a dozen other games this shit has happened to this year.