rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-05-03 11:35 am

You sound fat

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
I'd be glad to if I could figure out who the fuck my grudgewanker is.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
you wouldn't even have to worry about a grudgewanker if there weren't anoncomm platforms for them to jerk it off from

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, they've existed since before the 24/7 anoncomms. That's how fucking determined they are.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
getting ride of anoncomms would certainly kill one of their platforms, at least.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
>'getting rid of this thing would get rid of your thing'.
>'not really, no'.
>'... it would so.'

MY WAY IS THE ONE TRUE WAY.

don't you have a child to sacrifice to the lord of light?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
except that there's been no "not really" and instead just rampant shitposting and a dash of "wah CENSORSHIP!"

getting rid of this thing would not solve the problem overnight. but it would definitely be a start

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
not really, no

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-05-24 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
didn't say it would get rid of it, but it would certainly make it more difficult for them to do so.

fucking pay attention, you magnesium tablet.