Warning: contains peanuts
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: The Nexus Is Now Open!
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)the whole reason we need a new dressing room comm like this in the first place is because of them and selwyn running rampant all over sws and the mod there refusing to do anything about it
no subject
Thanks!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)they've been mostly playing a kevin at
http://sixwordstories.dreamwidth.org/70308188.html?thread=4351962716#cmt4351962716
let me know if you need more information, because this person is one of the longest-running toxic players in dwrp/ljrp's history
no subject
I've discussed it with the other mod and we'd like to know if anyone has anything directly connecting the player of these muses and the player of
We're very hesitant to pre-ban someone based on these sorts of accusations, but we do want to get to the bottom of it all so we can make an educated decision. We've both just come back to RP after a long absence after the fall of LJRP, so we are a little out of the loop.
Please don't hesitate to PM us if you'd prefer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)They've also were banned from LJ SWS for constant player harassment and bakerstreet for the same. And this is coming from someone who has been dealing with them being unable to take no for an answer for years.
http://memebells.livejournal.com/278270.html?thread=279300606#t279300606
http://memebells.livejournal.com/278270.html?thread=278855422#t278855422
no subject
Clearly this player has annoyed a bunch of people. And I get that, sometimes things just don't click. That's perfectly alright, we're all adults here after all. I hope you can see our viewpoint that, that in itself not a reason to ban somebody, though.
If an issue arises in our community, we promise that it'll be dealt with swiftly and surely. Anyone who has been clearly told OOC to stop and refuses to do so will be dealt with. As mods though, we do try our very best to remain as fair as possible. So we feel that there has to be a clear example of someone making that request OOC and of it being ignored before we take action.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)i think you're missing the point here a little. it's most just this player being annoying that's their problem, it's how they refuse to show any respect at all for any of their fellow players and essentially treat everyone that isn't them like toys in their sandbox
see here, where a player expresses frustration over this player continuing to tag them despite being asked repeatedly not to:
http://memebells.livejournal.com/278270.html?thread=278963454#t278963454
see also here, in which an irl caseworker attempts to explain to her why people are having problems with her and is rudely rebuffed:
http://memebells.livejournal.com/308160.html?thread=293182400#t293182400
and see also here, in which they bully and godmod a new member of the community into going along with their violence/cannibalism kink:
http://dear-multiverse.livejournal.com/4504620.html?thread=256757036
this player's problems go way past simply being annoying. they have zero respect for anyone that is not themselves, refuse to take no for an answer and endlessly spam whatever community they're ever a part of, taking advantage of people who don't know about their seamy reputation to get the fetish fuel they want
most damningly, this player admitted once, and i really want to find this link for you so hopefully i'll have a follow-up soon, they admitted that they push the cannibalism/violence stuff so hard because they are using their character's victims are proxies for 'bullies' they dealt with in real life. that goes past beyind an annoying player, or even a toxic one. that's downright psychotic
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)i apologize if that last reply came off as a bit on the hostile outside, it's just that this player has a long history of weaseling her away into comms because of people feeling sorry for her and then shitting them up until they die
i really want this place to get off the ground and be a part of it but i just won't deal with this player again. you couldn't pay me enough, i'm sorry to say
no subject
I understand that static text can make it difficult to convey tone and nuance, so don't worry. We're all just trying to make a nice place.
Thank you for your support, and I completely understand where you're coming from. We're going to continue reviewing all the information everyone is being kind enough to share with us.
While we can't guarantee an auto-ban, we can guarantee that this person will be watched like a hawk should they join Sages and any of this sort of behaviour will not be tolerated.
We hope our vigilance will be enough to assuage your concerns.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 19:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:19 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Yes, this player very obviously has a problem with concrit. A disturbing problem they should discuss with a licensed professional, and I hope they've done so at some point in the intervening years.
But this is from three years ago. People can change. Yes, I know it's unlikely, but I also know it's possible. I believe in second chances. Gods know I've been given a few in life, probably more than I deserved.
So while this is good to know and a reason to keep an eye on certain accounts more closely, I don't think it's a reason to ban anybody yet because there's no evidence that this behavior has continued.
If you can provide evidence from this year, something that shows that the same problems continue to occur, then that would change things. And by "evidence" I don't mean "oh here's a thread where I think they RP badly and I hate how they play this character" (these are legit reasons to make a personal choice to not play with someone but they're not reasons to ban someone from a whole community); I mean "here's proof they've been told to leave someone alone within the last 6 months and they haven't done so" or "here's proof recently where they had another meltdown about concrit" or something like that.
No permanent decisions have been made. We're still in information-gathering mode over here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
here's another thread with evidence of her constant pushing for characters to randomly rape hers:
http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/31071.html?thread=115670111#cmt115670111
no subject
Are they playing a different character with us?
We'd like to know so we can know which journals to keep an eye on.
Thanks!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)the moment they find out about this comm they'll flood with their kevin, master and gollum journals and get to work driving off anyone that might be interested in joining
for my part, i've been burned enough by them on sws that i'm flat-out not going to join this until i'm sure i don't have to worry about them pouncing on me as they've done over and over and over and over again in the past
no subject
We hope everyone understands.
If any issues come up however, please feel free to PM either Girliemod or I at anytime. We may also consider starting up an OOC Comm for Sages for these sorts of things to be directed to.
We understand that everyone here is trying to look out for us and we appreciate that very much! Hopefully our choice to try avoiding an auto-ban as far as possible doesn't rub you all the wrong way.
But we promise we'll be as vigilant as possible. I can also personally promise that I am not afraid to use the banhammer should it become necessary. And while I am the softer touch between us two mods - you really don't want to get on Girliemod's bad side ;) - I do not tolerate wank, OOC abuse, stalking, or any other disturbing behaviour. Not in my community. Not to my precious bb members, because I revived Sages to have a good time and I'm not going to let anyone ruin that for the rest of us. You have my word.
Hopefully we'll see you in-game and we can all have a good time. :)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 17:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 19:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-07 23:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:18 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 18:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 19:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
+1
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 01:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-06 15:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-06 15:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-07 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 20:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 21:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 20:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-05 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-05 22:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-06 04:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-06 16:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-07 01:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 19:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)http://dear-mun.dreamwidth.org/4496378.html?thread=140866810#cmt140866810
> http://kostinaya.dreamwidth.org/311.html?thread=44343#cmt44343
> http://sixwordstories.dreamwidth.org/70072162.html
the player dodged a ban from bakerstreet and made a thin threat against the bakerstreet mods after people reported her.
http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/3849.html?thread=8635401#cmt8635401
In links to her response to her ban from lj sws.
no subject
Please keep in mind I took a 5 year break from journal RP, so if I'm missing something, kindly explain?
da
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)It looks benign enough on its own, but if you read the other link in there along with it, you see it's a pattern of behavior she's had for years and hasn't grown out of - the "something she doesn't like happens oocly, so she puts up entries and makes "IC" threats soon after" thing is what's being displayed in the WG link from 2012.
The point, I think, is that although many of the links we have quick access to happened years ago, she's still engaging in the same sorts of behavior that put people off then and make them want to avoid her now. It's because she hasn't changed at all in that time that there is seemingly little evidence - people avoid the fuck out of her because she hasn't changed, so it never escalates to as much damning evidence as there has been in the past. It can't escalate if they don't engage.
And while "ignore her and move on" is a possible course of action for people to take, ignoring her and moving on in this case would mean failing to post in your comm because although you've said nobody has to reply to her, nobody wants to deal with the possibility of coming into contact with her. She's been this way for years and hasn't changed in the years that she's stuck around here despite receiving concrit and people trying to help.
Re: da
The times of the post are close, yes, but I don't think that's enough to make a real case for actual threats. The SWS post seems pretty IC for that version of the Master.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not longing to play with this person. From what I've read I'll be staying the hell away from them.
But try and see this from an outside perspective: I don't know any of you. All I know is that a couple of people are complaining about stuff that happened years ago, and have no evidence they've been able to show me that it's still happening. This doesn't really look good for anyone involved.
New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:54 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 20:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
Re: New Anon
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-03 21:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
da
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-07 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
Re: New Anon
(Anonymous) - 2015-06-04 00:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: New Anon
da
(Anonymous) 2015-06-03 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)https://web.archive.org/web/20150401210845/http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1286855.html
judging from the link above, it doesn't look like they've changed at all