rpanons | Okay

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

you know i always think poor physical coordination could actually be an interesting flaw if it actually got in the way at crucial moments and the character actively worked towards having better coordination. but it's never done like that.

It really isn't. If it's a guy it's for slapstick and they're meant to be the butt of jokes. If it's a girl it's to make her more cute and endearing. It never is seen, really, as something to be surmounted.

pretty much. the only exception i've seen lately is the girl in bates motel with cf, because she isn't cuter for it. instead you just wonder if her lungs will kill her before norman does.

Always thought the same thing. These sort of "flaws" disappear whenever it would actually seriously affect things, which kind of defeats the point of a character flaw.

Which brings another thing for OP: flaws are interesting when they actually have logical consequences (whether they're subtle or dramatic) and come from understandable places. Not necessarily sympathetic at all, but you can see the train of thought.

Okay

da

ayrt

Re: ayrt

+1