socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2024-04-03 08:06 pm

next time i'm sticking to my antisocial ways

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Re: GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
your conspiracy theories lol

da

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
nothing in their theory actually involves a conspiracy, but nice try

dda

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
"it also feels like there's at least one sour grapes jerk that just keeps trying to flood stuff in an attempt to force the mods into moderating a queue or something" think they're talking about this since there's no evidence of it

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
there's been some pretty vocal conversation on wg and here about 'why don't they just moderate a queue already' and after that, the flood started getting really bad. i know some of the posters for memes go there since i read it there and i'm a poster and gutties responded on there that they were going to keep doing the 12 on the dot postings for awhile and that was done out of spite, so it's less a conspiracy theory and more just a possibility and a guess. the uptick of postings does get worse when the topic of memes comes up on wg and the sameness of them also increases. they push that line of 'posting a day before they should' and whenever memes get taken down, there's suddenly a flood of replacements.

it's not hard to look at that and see a spiteful, intentional reaction.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
it could just as easily be someone spitefully posting more memes in response to people complaining about too many memes... why would someone who wanted a moderated queue spam memes when that hasn't ever worked to create a moderated queue lmao

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
that's a conspiracy theory hon. the "really bad flood" has been happening off and on for months to a year.

usually on Thursdays.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
do you believe a conspiracy theory is defined by how much or how little evidence exists to support it

because that would explain a lot about this conversation

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
don't assume malice in what can easily be explained by stupidity

i think it's way more likely to be some clueless rper who genuinely thinks they're helping by posting lots of memes for people to have lots of options, there are definitely people out there who think that there needs to be a separate meme for every single thing

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-04-30 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
i think it's this

we've even seen people here innocently encouraged to create and post memes that are already right there on the front page. two regular meme posters will accidentally and without malice double post smut picture prompts within hours of the other and then just leave them up because they didn't check.

lots of people here just aren't reading the same room we are.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 11:56 am (UTC)(link)
You are seriously overestimating people

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
nah i just don't read malice into actions that have been happening for a long time just because some trolls who probably don't even rp anymore mouthed off on wg last week

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)
the moderated queue people spamming the comm conspiracy theory makes even less sense given that the suggestion was actually reasonable
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/66149.html?thread=266836069#cmt266836069

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
the first convo about it here was more heated, but i was probably the most vocally aggressive person participating and i are as hell ain't spamming the community. that's the opposite of what i would like to see lol?

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
*sure

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm the one who brought up the moderated queue this time and I'm not sitting around spamming either. unless there's some rogue meme hater doing it, it's safe to say that the people spamming are the same people who are always spamming bakerstreet

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2024-05-01 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
look up the definition of a conspiracy some time. It doesn't mean 'a single person doing something i don't like'