rpanons | generously pack butt with peanuts & carrots

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

is that ic for law because he didn't used to be like that so much?

i think ayrt meant the player, not the character

Personally, I mean both.

i'm ayrt and i do mean both tbh. canonblind but the player absolutely did not play the character like "if you don't think he's using you, you're wrong" which is not the impression i got until his cr with caedra started.

now it looks like law is claiming he had no part in the infamous tree genocide to make his stupid boats which i'm honestly wondering if the player has run by the others who were involved in that and the mods, but knowing them i doubt it.

i doubt the player has talked to anyone about that claim. curufin was saying something similar back when it first happened. it doesn't sound like any of them are willing to deal with the ic consequences.

i saw both of these, and i take solace in that in ic terms it just makes their characters look like huge untrustworthy liars because i don't think anyone ic or ooc buys it

For fuck's sake. This is a ciolation of rules. Please bring this to the mods.

it isn't a report-worthy offense for a character to lie about their part in something, which is all this is right now. you're welcome to bring it to the mods yourself but until it's more than ic denial there's nothing actionable

Consistently having problems with a player is though. At least ask the mods to keep an eye on them

i really don't think the character is lying so much as it's the player trying to backpedal on dealing with ic consequences.

no don't you see law was only TANGENTIALLY RELATED to building the ships that he proposed and designed and provided input for

what did they think the ships would be built from
hopes and dreams?

here's a thought, and it's a revolutionary one I know: maybe that's something the character would say that the player doesn't necessarily believe?

could you be any more obvious argustar? you need to stop taking things said to your characters personally.

nope, still pretty sure it's the player trying to backpedal out of ic consequences. unless law is the type of character who would go on about how he's "too intelligent" to people. that read more like something from a facebook argument i've had than something i'd expect from rp.

not argustar, before you make the accusation. it might be a revolutionary thought to you but there's a chance that there are more than one or two players who are done with gemini's shit.

https://i.gyazo.com/e8384a607920e74d2b6446ed74a74779.png
https://i.gyazo.com/ab26cd59a249633ef82842f0c7f6d8a5.png

I posted that because I WAS NOT the person posting about Law or anything else in this thread. I also stayed out of the other drama and had it like linked to elsewhere. I’m sure that you won’t believe me, but I absolutely didn’t post that link or anything else here except for this statement.

this doesn't make any sense.

https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/76623.html?thread=238106447#cmt238106447

you didn't reply to this?

That was the one and ONLY time I commented, to come to my own defense. I have no problem with Law or the player, so why would I have posted that thread being referred to above? I have done my best to keep a firm IC/OOC divide and behave as well as I can. As far as I’m concerned, anybody can come to me with any issues they might have with me. We’re all adults here, or at least I hope so.

i'm ayrt but i'm also a passing flat viewer here so i don't have any horse in this race nor do i care about the minutiae. i'm just trying to make sense of what you're saying. did you or did you not reply to that comment? and if so, why would you add that cutesy line about "thanks for trying" like... i get wanting to clear your name but that's not how you comment when you try to do that.

people usually leave "hi x" comments alone, ftr

if that was the case, why did you delete in a panic?

can't speak for argustar but if it happened to me i'd rather not leave my logged in comment because i wouldn't want to deal with getting anon notifs in my inbox, esp when many of those comments are going to be "hurr you should never comment logged in durr" anyway.

meh, people can make harmless anonfails all the time and nobody cares. i've made a couple myself and my inbox never got spammed because i wasn't wanking in any capacity on those occasions, and it was pretty obvious

on the other hand, refuting a hi x comment as false when you actually are x is pretty fucking funny. also lends unfortunate mild credibility to them actually wanking about in this thread too, so lmao

i can see how that would be sketch. i actually don't mind argustar that much, so seeing her come here to try and refute a stupid "hi x" comment was disappointing. personally i don't think the earlier comment sounded like something she would say at all so i doubt it was her, but i don't blame others for being skeptical after the anonfail.

argustar, if you're reading this: i like you enough, but please please PLEASE just don't engage with anons regardless of what they say about you, even if you know they're wrong. it almost always just makes things worse.

Re: lmao caught

(Anonymous) - 2018-11-04 01:24 (UTC) - Expand

exactly, and the way it was worded wasn't like someone trying to clear their name. it was someone caught, as the anon who posted the screenshots noted

If you're expecting Gemini to come to you to plot just about anything, you'll be waiting for a long time, anon.

you're right, they didn't use to be. both the player and the character

generously pack butt with peanuts & carrots

Re: HADRIEL

no subject

DA

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

https://hadriel.dreamwidth.org/226043.html?thread=29907963#cmt29907963

no subject

no subject

lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

Re: lmao caught

no subject

Re: HADRIEL