socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2017-03-29 07:33 am

We mustn't offend the all powerful NPCs!

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are still banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm guessing that it's because some players want romance but don't want to write porn, while some players just want smut

da

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)
that's it for me, at least. they scratch two different itches for me, the same way gen and shipping or gen and smut do.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
it's still stupid to get offended by the connection. things being related doesn't mean they're the exact same thing.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
no one's offended by the connection. they're saying that for the purpose of categories on backerstreet, there are three separate categories, of which memes are usually evenly balanced on. so there's 19 smut/shipping and 9 gen? seems skewed until you separate the two smushed into one category and work it as 10 shipping, 9 smut, and 9 gen. then it's more even.

less ammo for your argument, but fair.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
That's not the point, though, because we're talking about this in the context of the need for a gen-oriented community. So in that context, putting ship/smut together naturally makes sense.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
no. it was taken as a consensus of gen being swamped out of bs. and in relation to it being ONE OF THREE categories, which is a fucking thing that you don't get to just sweep under the carpet to make your point, gen is not being swamped out. gen is evenly on par with the other TWO categories of the comm. it may feel like it's being swamped if you have no interest in shipping or smut, but it's on an even playing field with the amount of categories in it, which are gen, ship, smut. that's how it's always been categorized. you don't get to change it because you're making a point that isn't.

and from what i saw of the conversation, there were mentions of putting shipping (at least) memes in the 'new gen comm', so maybe you all want to talk among yourselves as to what you expect from this. you can't smoosh part of a category in the 'no' section, then say 'well, that part of the no is okay, but only that part... which isn't actually part of that other dirtier part'. almost like it's its own category.

inception.

sa

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
from the original post.

"What about a BS alternative, one that focuses on those memes which are not relationship based? They wouldn't necessarily be banned outright, but one that would discourage a weekly "mid-fuck" or whatever have you meme."

tlh is actually the 'smut' comm, but i suppose if you're only in it for gen and fluffy cuddles, bs seems more smutty. still. it wouldn't be a gen only comm. so why put ship/smut together when it's not being treated the same in the suggestion?

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Nobody said anything about ship memes being in the no category. Literally no one said that. We're not here to argue which meme category is better. We're not saying shipping or smut is the root of all evil or dirty, that's some projecting you've got going on. We're here because we're hoping for a more gen-friendly community, because BS has a lot of ship and smut memes posted and some of us would like something different. That's it.

I really don't know what you all are even arguing for. Nothing's going to change on BS. A new comm with more gen leanings will not murder BS or the existence of ship/smut memes. If you don't like a comm with less ship/smut, simply stick to BS.

For the record, I think it's fine that BS is mostly ship/smut, if that's what people want to play. I'd just like a sandbox for more of things I want to play. (And will be going to BS when I feel like playing ships.)

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
hey, genius? bs is plenty gen friendly to the point where it's evenly posted with shipping AND smut memes. the memes are there. people just don't post in them as frequently as they do the others. implying that bs isn't gen friendly is essentially you calling it a dirty place. it's not. gen just isn't that prevalent outside of games atm.

as i've said multiple times during this thread, make the comm. i hope op does. i've even given pretty decent advice to facilitate that. but this whole sub argument is because someone lumped two categories together to make the numbers seem worse than they were to 'prove a point'. the point you really want to make is that you want more gen, not evenly ratioed gen. you're being a dick about it, btw.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
The original numbers were to refute the idea that BS is 'mostly gen', according to the comment above, so either way it's a pointless argument. I mostly agree with your other points (besides the weird insistence that anyone who lumps ship/smut together must find them dirty), so I don't really know why we're apparently arguing. I guess if discussing meme categories makes me a dick then sure.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
you're trying so hard to make yourself look like the long-suffering, reasonable grown-up victim, lol. if you really want your gen-only, no filth allowed playground, then go. make it. no one's stopping you. just realize that your premise of "all the smut is drowning out the gen!" is utterly flawed and no one is going to come play with you.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
you are salty as fuck about something

you really need to get laid

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
You are finding it really hard to fathom that people could want a gen-oriented comm and also want to play ship and smut, huh.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I think this person is waiting for someone to go "get out of here, you icky whore!" so they can point and scream about us proving their point for them.

When confronted with logic, they simply don't know how to respond.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
you sound like a youtube intellectual now. "logic is on my side, because i say so! therefore, i cannot be wrong!"

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
please go get laid

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
if you attribute being laid and sexual satisfaction to enjoying shipping/smut, then you likely cross the ic/ooc boundaries a lot. some people can manage not to do that. my rl sexual status has no effect on what i play online. funny how that works, isn't it?

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
god damn, you're salty.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-10 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
The funny thing is, they're pretty much the only one in the discussion (not counting the obvious trolls) screaming about dirty shipping whores. Damn, anon, which gen player kicked your dog?