rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-10-02 03:06 am

All the pretty little anons

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
and yet the "hillary defended a rapist" talking point keeps coming up

again

and again

and again

and it will keep coming up, because the facts of the situation don't matter

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
... anon, parent up a bit.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
i've read the whole thread. hillary was a public defender and gets shit for it, public defenders in general get shit on and are overworked, someone pointed out that john oliver did a piece on them, it was dismissed as biased. ta da.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
someone did, but i think that's just because they saw "john oliver" and ignored literally everything else, so i guess you're still right, but the system being broken isn't, like... a biased position left or right. it's kind of something everyone agrees is busted.

the methods of fixing it are where party lines get drawn, which the video isn't about.