rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-05-03 11:35 am

You sound fat

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
nope, show me where i said anything like that

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
"it's all about CALORIES, you guys. CALORIES. that is the only thing that makes sense in this equation and if you argue otherwise, lol fatlogic you're a fat loser"

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
You're literally saying that nothing besides eating can affect your weight. Nothing modifies that in your world. It's all just tubbies stuffing their faces. Medication, genetics, metabolism, etc. doesn't affect anything.

So blue + yellow = more blue and yellow

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
yes, it is all about calories and eating

medication, genetics, and metabolism are factors, sure, whatever. but what i've been saying FROM THE BEGINNING and what literally everyone arguing that subject has always said, is that you take those things in to account when determining how many calories you need to stay under per day

that's why there are no hard and fast "stick to 1500 calories" rules, because people are different sizes, have different activity levels, have different ~genetics~, etc

someone could lose weight on 1500cal a day, while the girl right beside her could gain weight. that's why it IS about calories. calories are your tailor-made plan. calories are far, far more important than exercise, since exercise only burns a surprisingly small amount of calories. it's about you determining the right calorie bracket for your god damn body

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
okay, and if the girl beside her is gaining weight on 1500 calories a day and has to cut down to 700- to LOSE weight, there's a problem. because 700 calories a day is not enough to keep a fully grown adult person comfortably fed all day. so your answer is for people to effectively starve themselves if they have extenuating outside factors that make normal weight loss an impossibility for them. 'but it's not really starving because you're still fat'.

ok.

seriously, what fat person crushed your cat, anon.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
>comfortably fed

so this is what it comes down to. fatty feeling full. psychologically starving is not the same as physically starving. let's say hypothetically a person's body only requires 700 calories a day to function safely and effectively. if that's the case, then YES THEY SHOULD STICK TO THAT. i don't care if they eat it all in one sitting or if they graze all day long to help them feel more satisfied. if a person's body honest to god only requires 700 calories a day to thrive, then that's how the fuck it is. that's how calories and bodies work together. if you consume more than you use, it turns in to fat

obesity is an epidemic and you're severely underestimating it if you don't think of it the same way

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
so you'd prefer people to suffer every single day of their lives to be aesthetically pleasing to you

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
if their body is getting all the calories and nutrients it needs, how are they suffering? obesity isn't just about being aesthetically pleasing. it's a drain on resources, on time, on the space of others, on other peoples' health and wellness. i know fat people love to say their fatness isn't impacting anybody else, but it is

obesity is selfishness

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
how does someone's obesity affect other people? honestly, i want to know. if you don't like how an obese person looks i guess that's eye strain, but i don't know how someone's weight affects another person's "health and wellness."

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
obesity has all kinds of strange filtered-down consequences. first is shit like taking up space. if someone has to awkwardly twist themselves on a long plane or train ride to dodge someone's fat spilling over in to their seat, it's a strain on them physically

a car carrying, say, an entire fucking family of obese people, can not stop as quickly due to the added weight. a lot of times, supermorbid obesity causes maneuverability issues with a driver. their gut is in the way, their arms are too fat to turn the wheel as much as they need to, etc

medical workers have it the worst. the number of injuries sustained by nurses trying to handle fat patients is just a god damn tragedy. back and neck injuries aren't a joke. this can also count for rescue workers

speaking of rescue workers, it's honestly dangerous for certain professionals to be obese, and it severely impacts their ability to work. fat firemen, fat cops, fat emts. if you can't even run up a flight of stairs without wheezing, can't chase down a criminal or get a decent hold on him because your gunt is in the way, lift a normal-weight person, or fit in to spaces you need to fit in to? that's a danger to the people you're supposed to be protecting. you've lost the ability to do your job

obesity can also cause problems during emergency evacuations. no one wants to be behind a fat person while they're trying to escape a dangerous situation

there have also been interesting points made about national security. obesity is even having an impact on that. we're literally getting so fat as a nation that a people are being turned away from the military because they're too fat to perform

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
your hatred of fat people is astounding and i am awed by how hard you're trying to justify it. i applaud for you.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, i do hate fat people. that's something i don't deny

you know i have a fucking point though

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
being obese in certain professions isn't a good idea, it's true, and i will give you that. but bro there is really no reason to care if someone is fat. why are you devoting so much energy to this, it is such a minor, inconsequential part of life. you need to let it go.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
> how hard you're trying to justify it.

no, no you really don't.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
and there's the flaw in your argumen. just because someone isn't losing weight doesn't mean they're getting all the calories OR nutrients they need. at all. the fact you seem to think that's what it is is where this argument is circling around.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
pls try again in english

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
yes, because missing a t suddenly makes a sentence illegible.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
it has nothing to do with the missing t

da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
this whole thread is fucking stupid but an adult needs more than 700 calories a day. your body needs calories to function, and 700 is not nearly enough. how may calories a day you actually needs varies a lot depending on what you're eating and activity level etc etc, but your body cannot function on 700. that's malnutrition.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
i guess you missed the hypothetical part huh

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
i love how their disordered eating keeps slipping out

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
and if someone is trying to stay 'healthy', that includes eating enough to not feel like they're starving (unless that have that weird disorder that always makes them hungry). if someone is eating under a normal amount of food a day because for whatever reason, their body doesn't burn fat that easily and while someone else can either stay steady at 1000 calories a day or lose weight on it, 1000 a day has them still gaining wait and/or feeling unsatisfied because 1000 calories just isn't as much as you seem to think it is, then no, 1000 is still not healthy. if they're down to 700 to try to lose weight because you point your finger and call them a fatty mcfatty and they're feeling hungry and tired all day, but hey, it's all about trying to lose weight, right? no, that's not okay.

god, i pity you and your outlook on life.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
you should pity your fatlogic tbh. you're helping literally no one by enabling them and keeping them fat, because fat is an illness