rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-01-05 03:19 pm

Found the token ace

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
it was still a success, financially.

it's okay if you didn't like it, but facts is facts, having a poc actor/actress play a traditionally white character has zero negative effect on how successful a movie is.

plus I like it. Annie's not meant to be a well-written film, and really neither is Nancy Drew. so /SHRUG

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
it barely made it's money back anon

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=annie2014.htm you mean doubled?

you can stop pulling facts out of your ass to justify your dumb stance any moment now

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
you do realize that's barely in the movie world right?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
according to whom? to what authority? because everyone involved with the film itself, most importantly its producers who bankrolled the thing, are happy with those numbers.

movies don't have to be giant blockbusters to be successful. you don't seem to understand how the film industry works.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-15 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)
neither do you

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
it made more money than it cost to make. comparing it to other movies is irrelevant. that's not how business works, movies or otherwise