rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-01-05 03:19 pm

Found the token ace

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
you know that, i know that, too many people don't know that

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnViqstGsYs&t=11m24s

this girl was a professional groupie. radfems crying RAPE don't seem to fucking notice that she didn't look 13 or even 14 in the pictures of her linked in this thread.

this isn't r kelly.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
we know full well that she doesn't look her age, actually. it just doesn't change that he shouldn't have done it.

not agreeing with you is not the same thing as not understanding the situation

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
if it was the mid sixties (let's say 1965) bowie would have been 18 not 30

just sayin

da

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure how well you understand that, though. Like, how was he supposed to know how old she was? Even if he'd thought to ask, she was well prepared to lie to him.

This is not a black and white issue. People keep telling you that, but you don't seem to understand in spite of the why being explained.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
no one's arguing that it shouldn't have happened, anon. what people are trying to hammer home is that he wasn't aware how old she was. 'he shouldn't have had sex with... a girl he thought was legal age'. that's what you're saying and that's what's trying to be impressed here. he didn't do it intentionally. you can't blame a guy for having sex with a willing girl that he thinks is legal and equate it to a guy having sex knowingly with a willing minor. those two things are so very different.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
are they saying dark souls promotes social darwinism because it's hard? how the fuck do you reach that sort of conclusion?

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:29 am (UTC)(link)
actually, google tells me it was 1972 since that's when she was 13. which would make bowie 25.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:31 am (UTC)(link)
because they're an idiot teenager.

like, this isn't a gg/anti-gg thing, she's just an idiot. she'll grow out of it, probably.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
apparently she was 15 when it happened?

there are some conflicting accounts here

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
How do people not understand this?

The overall health of the game is way more important than protecting the hurt feefees of a noxious asshole that doesn't even treat their friends with respect.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
most reports say 13/14, but she never actually specifies, likely because she doesn't want to bring that up. it was before she hooked up with jimmy page, which was when she was 14.

http://www.theestablishment.co/2016/01/11/david-bowie-rape-accusations-sexual-assault/

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:39 am (UTC)(link)
i feel like this sums it up best

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:39 am (UTC)(link)
well, she was also stoned most of the time during that age, so it's understandable she might not actually remember how old she was.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:40 am (UTC)(link)
l m a o

ok let me break this down for you: he didn't prowl around the groupies asking who was the youngest. he didn't knowingly stalk or seduce her or go looking for someone under the age of 18. if anything? she was something of a predator.

she had been through puberty and got herself dressed up to show that ~of age~ looking body off. she got the fake id and sought him out looking to fuck while both were high. this is NOT rape. was it a good thing? no, i don't think so. he didn't think so either.

she on the other hand.........

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
it

does

not

matter

that

she

didn't

look

13

he

committed

a

crime

and

took

advantage

of

someone

who

no

matter

what

she

says

cannot

give

sexual

consent


maybe if i space it out you'll read what i am saying

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
theestablishment, wow. totally legit official sourcing skillz. -100/10

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
so glad rape culture is still very much alive and well.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
continue to defend the man that you like for committing a crime against an underage girl.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:43 am (UTC)(link)
let me write this in very big letter so that you can read and finally comprehend

BOTH OF THEM WERE HIGH. AND SHE WENT AFTER HIM WITH A FAKE ID ON HER. SHE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HIM.

Not the other way around moron.

Re: http://www.theestablishment.co/2016/01/11/david-bowie-rape-accusations-sexual-assault/

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:43 am (UTC)(link)
uh, the rape case they talk about was thrown out without indictment. the woman tried to sue him for exposing her to AIDS, a disease he never had. like, I know that false accusations are actually exceptionally rare and there's usually a lot of judicial sexism that keeps cases from going to trial, but this is one of the few that genuinely did not hold up.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:44 am (UTC)(link)
jajajajajajaja

tumblr -------------------------->

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
yes it's the 13 year old's fault

jesus fucking christ, slam your hand in a door or something so that you stop posting this garbage

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
people get what you're saying

they just don't think this is a case of Bowie Evil/Maddox Good. it's nuanced, grey, it's not a black and white situation. you're ignoring the facts of the matter, and the account of the victim, to make a political case.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-01-12 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
anon, this case is grey as poupon, but Lori was not a fucking predator either. They were BOTH high on drugs provided by a third party. NEITHER could give legal consent.

You really need to drop that attitude if you expect to be taken seriously.