United Cameridian Alliance
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)Could have avoided that problem easily by just making it totally random for everyone, but no, they had to come up with some superficial way to determine monsters that isn't the same for each player, which makes the whole thing pointless and totally random again, just random in disguise.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)what
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)And yes, if someone chooses "conflicts" and gets a monster that obviously has traits the player listed, that's plain idiotic.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Actually, yes, I think so. They are public after all. You may disagree of course.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Although, now that you can pretty much give your character any mental change you want, I might suggest that the mods take the ones in the bestiary down so people don't think those are the only ones they're allowed to have.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)Sorry you're butthurt about your monster (and you say you're totally fine with it but you're clearly butthurt that you didn't get one of the few you decided were perfect for your character in advance), but the mods were always upfront about the fact that not every choice will be obvious. Not every character even HAS an obvious choice - there are 19 monsters, iirc, and over a hundred characters, every single character isn't going to be a perfect fit for one of the 19. Most people use all 5 opt outs, so in that case there were only 14 possible monsters they had a chance to fit perfectly with.
I'll be the first one to say the mods have made some poor decisions in regards to apps, but in this case you're just making up your own trait list based on wild guesses and crying "random in disguise" when the mod decision doesn't sync up with it. There might not have been a monster that fit or conflicted your character well, or you might have opted out of it. You SAY there were ones that fit, but you're going on personal speculation or one or two traits at most.
Can't crack their system after a single app round and figure out every trait out of the potentially hundreds submitted that go with every monster? THEY MUST BE BULLSHITTING THEIR ENTIRE METHOD!! I've seen people say the mods made a poor choice because they didn't pick a monster with abilities that resemble their canon character's powers, and I've seen some people with just plain shitty trait lists, so while the mods aren't prefect I'm not exactly trusting the playerbase to objectively determine whether their monster fit or not.
+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Just not the way the mods handle the monster-picking thing. That's not the same thing as hating on the monster you got at all.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)You're getting really upset over what you perceive as mod dishonesty when it would have been so much easier to say "yeah it's random except for your opt outs" in the first place. Why on earth would the mods decide to pretend it's not random when it secretly is when doing so would create way more player anger and drama than just saying it's random? It just seems stupid that you think they'd make this elaborate scheme to cover up their random selection when they'd derive no benefit from it. If they wanted to make it random they would have just said it's random.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-28 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)