rpanons | No tall men

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

an established sexuality isn't headcanon. there is proof, canon proof, that she's heterosexual. there is no proof for anything else and if you couldn't tell that she's just being written with a silly stereotypical TEEHEE GETTING COZY WITH THE GIRLS trope that's been prevalent in animanga for years, i think you need to pay closer attention. it is always, always played for laughs in the show with no serious overtures to it at all.

if you wanna musebox/meme it, be my guest, but she has a thing for dudes and a thing for lelouch. there's not much room for argument on the matter.

there's canon proof that she's attracted to men. not canon proof that she's attracted to men exclusively. so if she was being played as a lesbian who had an aversion to anything that even vaguely resembled a man, then yeah, she'd be ooc as fuck. but being bi, pan, and het are all equally valid interpretations, because no matter which interpretation the player chose, she'd still be attracted to men. you can scream that it's just fanservice and shouldn't be taken seriously all you want, but it doesn't contradict anything we actually see on the show, so it's not ooc.

her being bi is only your headcanon, unsupported by canon.

her being straight is completely supported by canon.

just let it go. headcanons are okay to play out in psls or something, just stop trying to make it canon.

so are you a troll, a grudgewanker, or someone who honestly doesn't understand how bi/pansexuality works?

do you

being attracted to one gender with no hints of attraction to the other =/= bi by default

not everyone in media is bi "unless otherwise specified" so as a bi person if you could stop perpetuating this shitty stereotype that'd be great

especially for a shitty show like geass whose idea of sexual progression is having a lesbian hump a table

1) grabbing another girl's tits on a regular basis is a pretty strong hint imo. it's not the most progressive representation on the planet, it just means that the idea of milly actually liking boobs isn't a hundred percent crazy talk

2) as another bi person, i'm shit of people assuming that everyone is straight unless you walk down the street wearing nothing but a rainbow flag. this isn't a "everyone is bisexual unless stated otherwise" thing, it's a "hey maybe that girl who flirts with other girls might actually be attracted to other girls" thing

it just sounds like a couple of people who are super salty about shitty ways people view bisexuals irl. if they didn't fight over milly they'd be fighting over some other dumb anime character

grabbing another girl's tits on a regular basis is a pretty strong hint imo

and argument discarded

that doesn't make her bi, it makes her rude and pushy and ~hilarious anime tropey~ which has been pointed out more than once in the thread to you. learn to examine things in context instead of just assuming dunderheaded BOOBGRAB = FLIRTING = ATTRACTION = BI logic.

i do. that's why i know that "everyone's bi unless otherwise specified" is bullshit.

No tall men

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

Re: dda

ITT: BISEXUAL SLAPFIGHT

+1

Re: dda

Re: dda