rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2014-06-14 11:34 am

Get a job

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

+1

(Anonymous) 2014-06-15 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Seconding all of this and adding the mods reserve the right to question an application if they've opted out of the most appropriate monsters may be an option for the opt-out method.
rysligmods: (Default)

Re: +1

[personal profile] rysligmods 2014-06-15 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't question an app over that, if only because the list of associated traits wouldn't be public and people might want to opt out of the most appropriate choice if they're from, say, Teen Wolf but don't want to default to werewolf. That was one of the reasons I wanted to allow opt outs in the first place: so characters that are monsters in canon don't have to play the exact same thing again.

Listing traits that don't seem to apply to the character or leaving out major traits in what looks like an attempt to bias the mods in one particular direction would call for revisions, though.

AYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-06-15 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
That's fair!