rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2012-02-22 10:08 pm

Everything is under control

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.


Temporary Change: To reduce the strain on Dreamwidth's servers new entries will go up when a post reaches 3,000. Please refrain from spamming so we can stretch these entries for a little longer. We don't need several threads soliciting photo evidence of body parts, and we already know that we only care about yaoi. Failure to comply will only result in deletions and butthurt. "People may notice site slowdown/cache error pages. We're working on fixing. You can help: finish posts at 3k comments, not 5k or more." - Dreamwidth@Twitter

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.


Concerns?


Navigate:

Hey! Do not post anything outside of these threads. It will be deleted.
Go be cute and fun and fun and funny over here.

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2012-03-03 07:51 am (UTC)(link)
Then why is the nature of the game, IE the "smalltown community feeling," brought up at all? By bringing up these elements, it creates the implication that by adding new teams, we are introducing a potential problem to the setting. In other comments in this thread, anons have mentioned that everything IC and OOC works the way it is. These are points only made when the opposite or potential opposite is "new teams will change that."

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2012-03-03 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
Because if "add more teams" is the only solution people can come up with for being resentful of the queue, that's exactly what's going to change, because long-term adding two more teams hasn't fixed the queue either of the previous times it's been done.

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2012-03-03 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
Because we're already looking ahead to the point where it becomes an issue again. If your solution to "the queue is too long" is "add more teams" then that's going to keep on happening until the game is unrecognisable. Two more teams right now isn't going to change the nature of the game, but what about a few months down the track when the queue gets long again and you start saying we just need two more teams again? I don't object to 14 teams in principle as a game size, I object to it as a solution to the queue, because if that's the solution then the number is just going to keep increasing.

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2012-03-03 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
"A few months" is different from almost a year, and I personally think AJ and Zazzle are more on point with things enough to know that things should be stalled. Things have been stalled. The queue filled up in December. We're in March. They believed the queue would only stabilize. Unfortunately, it hasn't, a whole two months later. It has only increased as the weeks have gone on.

However, we don't know if it would be a solution that would help or not. Yes, we talked in the past about dealing with the queue, but AJ said that there was a chance things would stabilize within a month—and they did. In this case, it's well over that, and even the mods are looking for a solution. I think that is a sign that two teams are probably the only thing we can look to, because nothing else works right now. I don't think it is perfect, but I do think it's better than doing nothing, which is currently what is being proposed. The status quo isn't working, so we should look to something else.

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2012-03-03 08:11 am (UTC)(link)
The queue will continue to be a problem as long as more people are apping than dropping. Adding two new teams will shake the status quo for a little while, but then the queue will start to build up again and what worries me is the thought that we'll be right back... well, probably not here because traditionally this discussion takes place on the OOC comm, but we'll be somewhere having this exact same discussion and reaching the exact same conclusions and deciding to add another two teams just to shake up the status quo etc etc.

I'm starting to think it might be more productive to have a discussion about what the absolute maximum team we're comfortable with is. However many we have, the queue will still become a problem, but at least we won't be arguing over two more not changing anything anymore.