socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2024-10-02 08:27 pm

the masses thirst for the smallest drop of wank

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
this thread is so bad. adults making fun of teenagers for how they look, because it impedes their ability to rp those teenagers on the internet, somehow? real question, what is wrong with some of you?

people get all up in arms about the crime of not wanting to rp with child/teen characters but THIS is why i don't want to rp with child/teen characters: the players are all screwed up about how they view minors and i don't want any contact with them. sorry this kid isn't hot enough for you!

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
you're reading way too much into this

the sorry dude was to the kid in question for finding him ugly, which was a passing observation based on a couple of caps on google. he's ugly, it doesn't ruin my day, but i am gonna comment on his weird face just like i've commented on benedict cumberbatch's weird face. if someone wants to rp billy and hates the actor they can play from the comics, it isn't as though the tv series is their only option

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
you're weird about kids.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
i know you're trolling but you do realize that most actors who play teens are actually in their 20s to 30s, right? he's 21, he isn't literally a teenager

should i just rescind my apology to him, will that make you feel better? here. he's as ugly as the guy who played merlin

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
whenever i see him i always think it's the merlin guy

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
If this is Joe Locke he's literally 21. He has not been "a kid" at any point during this show.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
+1 buncha weirdos itt

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
Ironic given people like you who take this shit WAY too seriously are why I'M wary about it.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 07:25 am (UTC)(link)
WON'T YOU PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN

THE 21 YEAR OLD LITERAL CHILDREN

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
sshhhh the actor is minor-coded it totally counts

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
what in the world does this even mean

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
it means that people can declare that finding certain grown-ass adults attractive is still icky because "they look like children" aka they're shorter and smaller than an average adult, or have a baby face in some way, etc

i fucking hate this virtue-signaling trend and wish it'd die in a fire already tbh

signed, a petite asian adult woman who has had people infantilise me to my face like this

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
this pretty much explains it.

for the most part i see it on twitter, like the fucking purity police over there screaming about how grown ass adults around the same age dating is "pedophilia" because one of them is "minor coded" i.e. they look younger than their actual age.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
i've seen people in real life flip out over grown adult relationships because 'minor coded'. like a 6'8 man dating a 4'11 or 5'0ish woman and it's 'well, he must be into kids because she's practically a kid compared to him'. and as someone that has had a babyface my whole life (in my mid forties now) and still get id'd in a country with a lower age of legalization than the us, it's a pain in the ass. and it makes me realize what 'minor coded' really is, when grown men were hitting on me when i was 14 with huge tits but a babyface. so they figured they'd get the best of both worlds, (adult body, baby face) but that was back when i was actually a minor.

adults who look young already have a burden to drag around with them. calling all their romantic partners 'pedophiles because of optics' is a dick move.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-10-05 09:31 am (UTC)(link)
you had a point in the first half but then you went full no ic/ooc divide anti