rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-07-04 05:39 pm

Explosions in the sky

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh sweet baby jesus yes. Reviewers were breaking the review embargo because the movie is just that BAD.

Image

This is how they beat the final ghost by the way.

Classy

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm sure a million tumblrinas jiggled with joy their bloated bodies could scarcely contain when they saw it

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
if not from that possible from the fact that every male character with screen time is either an idiot, an asshole, or both.

because feminism

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 14:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 15:49 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 19:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 20:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 06:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 13:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 21:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 04:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 07:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 09:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 11:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
fffffffaaaarrrrrrrrtttttttttt

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)
no1curr

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
ucurr

ucurrlot

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
tumblr would be that way -------------- >

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
FEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMMMMM11111111

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
only review I can find isn't saying it's terrible, just that it didn't do enough with its cast or premise, and played it safe the whole film rather than taking any real risks.

the same review recognizes that the massive social media controversy over the film (which you've insisted on perpetuating here for god knows what reason) may be the primary cause to blame for this, as Sony probably had the crew and cast remove anything that would have possibly stirred the pot even more, which is something that happens a lot whenever a film is generating a ton of controversy. not always, but often enough.

tbh it's not surprising. disappointing, but not surprising. not really as sensational (whether Very Good or Very Bad) as anyone on either side is going to make it out to be.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
you say the reviewer says it "plays it safe" when it's a movie that's been accused from day 1 of being feminazi sjw-pandering trash and somehow making it to the final cut is a scene where they kill the famous giant ghost by blasting in the crotch

i'm sure this movie will have problems but "playing it safe" doesn't seem like it was one of them

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 17:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 19:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 19:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 20:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 22:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 22:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 22:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 06:45 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 02:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 07:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 17:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 22:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 09:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 09:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 17:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 21:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 06:46 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 16:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 16:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 16:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 07:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 08:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 12:44 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 12:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 18:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 19:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 20:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:09 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Its not a published review (who listens to those anymore anyway?) but there is one up on youtube that was telling. Sounds like they pretty much ripped off the plot of the first movie but did it in an insulting way.

And they clearly didn't remove anything that might have been seen as controversial if people are still being offended. I am a woman and I am offended that all of the male characters in the movie are apparently being portrayed as mindless idiots not to mention the lame way the final villain is defeated. I like a bit of girl power in my movies but this just went overboard on it. I really wanted to like this movie too since I grew up watching the Real Ghostbusters but it just looks horrible.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
well you know the writers couldn't be assed to look at their own source material too.

there's this huge battle where the proton packs and poistron beams are destroying ghosts which the comics have shown that this is a worse idea then inviting Gozer or Tiamat for lunch on your world.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 08:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 11:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 11:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
will you idiots please stop feeding the trolls

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
better these trolls than others

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
anon agreeing with others about a shitty movie is not feeding the trolls

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
i cant believe people take fucking ghostbusters this seriously

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
But anon

Bustin' makes me feel good

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 22:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
feminism on my little pony

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
it's just one or two bored shitposters around here. further out on the internet, the mras are throwing a shitfit about FEMALES IN MUH CHILDHOOD and railing against imaginary feminists that think the movie is flawless because women.

so trolls and manchildren. meh.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 02:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 05:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 03:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 03:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 14:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 11:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 15:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 07:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 08:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 12:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

http://consequenceofsound.net/2016/07/ray-parker-jr-responds-to-fall-out-boys-catastrophic-ghostbust

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
super classy

Re: http://consequenceofsound.net/2016/07/ray-parker-jr-responds-to-fall-out-boys-catastrophic-ghost

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
face it, the song is shit.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-10 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
actually the movie has a 74% on rotten tomatoes so far

SOMEONE is giving this thing positive reviews, for whatever reason

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-10 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 01:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 02:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 05:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 05:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 06:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 19:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-11 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-12 07:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-13 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
if people are somehow still watching adam sandler movies, i can't and won't feel guilty in watching this.

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-13 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
this movie looks like complete garbage from a general standpoint but seeing my friends go full mra over this shit is really disturbing

i can't wait until this thing dies and is forgotten

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 22:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 02:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-13 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) 2016-07-14 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
This movie so undesirable as an action flick that not even China wants it. And they live action sci if campy stuff

You know like the original two were

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GHOSTBUSTERS

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-14 20:06 (UTC) - Expand