rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-05-03 11:35 am

You sound fat

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-21 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
huh. i actually didn't know this. i wonder how the investigation on that went since wouldn't they take into account receipts of agreeing to trade? like i know trading is supposed to be against the rules but if someone said "this person hacked my account" when they clearly gave it away is that still a bannable offense?

that sounds fucked up if not since i assume it's mostly friends trading/giving away usernames

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-21 08:46 am (UTC)(link)
No they wouldn't because that stuff can be faked quite easily, especially online. Most sites don't allow for giving away/trading/selling accounts because it is difficult for the site to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what truly happened and it becomes a matter of one person's word against another. DW staff would have to use information that can't be forged to prove ownership, and that's going to be login records and records of information changes on an account.

And if you think it's fucked up that people will do it, sadly it happens a lot. I've seen people get fucked over by friends and family all the time and it's usually because of some petty argument. Most companies don't want to get in the middle of personal disputes, so that's why they take the stance of it's the owner's responsibility. DW's only responsibility as far as security goes is to ensure that information that isn't publicly visible isn't leaked.