rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-05-03 11:35 am

You sound fat

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 01:28 pm (UTC)(link)
casual reminder that demisexuality isn't real

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)
ok

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Keep fucking that chicken.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
but I'm not emotionally attached to the chicken!!

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Why do you care if you think it isn't

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
not op but most of the time it feels like the person is saying "i'm not like those shallow people only attracted to people for sex, i need a DEEP EMOTIONAL CONNECTION FIRST"

casually ignoring this is how attraction works for everyone

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
but it doesn't happen like that for everyone. is it maybe alienating to people who are attracted sexually without knowing someone first? sure, but don't say that's how it works for everyone lol. there are definitely people who are sexually attracted to others without having a deep emotional attraction.

DA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, demisexuality describes the ONLY mode of attraction that is deemed acceptable for women by society at large. It's wrapped up in a whole bunch of bullshit baggage.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I was in my 30s when I read about demisexuality, realized I probably would have IDed as asexual at 16 had I known about it, and wouldn't have chased boys as a way to fit in back then.

I married my husband after dating him for almost 2 years and never knew what it meant to be sexually attracted to him until after the marriage. That's why I describe myself as demi rather than ace.

It bothers me when people say demisexuality isn't a thing when it describes my experience so well and knowing about it being a possibility might have saved me a lot of confusion.

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 16:21 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:18 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:42 (UTC) - Expand

+2

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-19 10:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 16:48 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:43 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 17:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 02:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 02:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 02:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 18:59 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 19:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 13:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-17 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 03:12 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
you dumb bitches just can't stand leaving the bait alone can you

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
it's called being bored and wasting time. so sorry that we're not waxing poetic about more mcu or got drama.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
at least fandom whining is rp-related a hell of a lot more than sexuality wank

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
if you're bored and want to waste time, go play fucking candy crush or robot unicorn attack or something

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
and here you are throwing your 2 cents in, too, so you're not special.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
It's real. But special snowflakes sure like to adopt it and asexuality to try to seem oppressed.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
i see a lot of people saying asexuals say they're oppressed on here but i've never actually seen that happen. am i just running in the wrong circles?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
they prefer to call it "asexual erasure"

https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/asexual-erasure

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
99% of asexual persecution is self-perpetuating. they claim to be oppressed, others mock them for thinking the shit they go through is anything like what gays and trans people deal with, they claim that mockery is oppression, repeat.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 04:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 04:19 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
I'm asexual. I can't speak for everyone, but imho there's nothing to oppress. Personally, I don't broadcast it to the world because I don't have much to say about it, but those I have spoken to have never mocked me. They have questions, but it's only because they're curious. No one is attacking anyone for being asexual. It can be seen as weird, but no one actually sees it as wrong.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-20 10:08 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
demisexuality was a label invented by a 15 year old on an erp site and seeing adults identify with it and talk about how oppressed they are for being demi makes my teeth grind

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
can we all at least agree that demiromantic is the far stupider special snowflake label that gets thrown around a lot?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
actually, yeah

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
oh yes. what the hell is that? you can't fall in love until you fall in love?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
only like those other romance sluts that give up their hearts to anyone walking down the street, demiromantics only fall in love with people they know well.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 03:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-05-18 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
splitting -sexual and -romantic like they're two different things is mind blowingly stupid

homosexual homoromantic? you're gay
heterosexual heteroromantic? you're straight
literally any other combination? you're bi/pan

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-18 20:14 (UTC) - Expand