rpanons | Found the token ace

Found the token ace

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

are you saying we dont have proof that he took advantage of at least one underage girl

or is her account, that she spoke about long before he died, just "making it up for attention"

you're like those people comparing it to bill cosby and saying "but it's not as bad because he didn't drug her and do it against her will"

i don't understand why nobody seems to realize that sex with a minor is n o n c o n s e n s u a l

it never is and never will be and you need to think long and hard about how you're putting rape on "tiers" like that excuses someone from it just because you like them

As for speed, for me it's because one a day or slower is typical for most of the people I encounter so it's hard to give a fuck and go faster.

i don't understand why you think believing someone unconditionally is ever a good idea. because the only thing that ever proved it was her account which was d i m i s s e d

Then where are the legit news sources that aren't basically the equivalent of the Enquirer?

That's all we're asking for.

For all we know, they made up that she even said that.

pokemon snap for the 3ds

did you actually read the post? it clearly cites the source it's getting the claim from, which you can go watch yourself

idk, what's the worst that could happen? i'd say contact them

citation needed

i need a source on it being debunked because otherwise i have no reason not to believe her.

You first radfem.

like above anon said the only sources are the equivalent of the Enquirer.

and just so you know i'm not trying to argue with you, really? i am legitimately upset and torn up over this because i love bowie but unless you have a source of her saying "just kidding" about her detailed account of having sex with him multiple times i literally cannot... not believe her. i want to believe he didn't do this. please give me a source on that.

you sound like you'd defend woody allen tbh so i don't know why anyone's bothering to debate you at all

i mean, i definitely don't, because a) i play pretty obscure characters so finding castmates at all is rare and b) they don't have any way of knowing if i've overplayed something and if i have, i can tell them. i don't see that i would ever get tired of a character as a whole because people play characters differently

why? because she's female and therefore infallible?

i still want links. i can't find anything on google relating to this being debunked, while there are pages of her accounts of having sex with him.

i knew as soon as i opened it there'd be a shitfest over this dude being a rapist

rpanons did not disappoint

there are documentaries where she says it on video. she doesn't call it rape, but she mentions her age and that she lost her virginity to him, so

i went looking for a source and

It is a biological imperative in the male of our species to want to fertilize the youngest healthiest fertile female available. If it wasn't for men having sex with young teenage girls our species wouldn't have survived. Age of consent laws have been around for less than a hundred years. That said, now that we have evolved past the threat of extinction we must obey the laws of society to protect young people from being exploited. But let's not pretend this wasn't a biological imperative for thousands and thousands of years.

ah, good ol' reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/33f2f5/til_david_bowie_iggy_pop_jimmy_page_ted_nugent/

i can't claim to be any good but i am definitely pinged by this, especially considering that i play both hux and kylo, and not any part of them ever will be loving doting space boyfriends.

if you want to pm me, my journal is inimicus so feel free to asks things or such. i'm so not used to using rpa this way so don't mind me being dumb.

yeah i think this is why people are being extra pissy about this

1. david bowie is a loved and respected icon, and
2. she says she had fun, the time of her life, etc

that still doesn't make it right. sorry. if bowie was a better person he would not have taken advantage of a 13 yr old girl. i don't care what drugs you were on or that "it was a trend of the time and nobody cared anyway". it's still reprehensible and i honestly thought he was above such a thing.

i love how they were like "you can't just whine when someone asks you for proof!" when they have literally done nothing but

the lack of proof of it being "debunked" is becoming conspicuous, rape-defender-anon

christ the spacing is huge

dw why

Maybe not everyone else loses interest so fast.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 150 of 287

Found the token ace

no subject

no subject

+1

no subject

DA

no subject

Re: CW: rape

no subject

no subject

Re: DA

no subject

sa

da

no subject

Re: DA

anon above

no subject

DO NOT FEED TROLL

Re: DA

da

no subject

Re: DA

Re: anon above

sa

no subject