rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2015-03-23 02:50 pm

Those suggestions sucked

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 12:14 am (UTC)(link)

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I want to play this specific pairing so much.

But even though I've read spoilers for most of canon I haven't actually finished it yet, so I'd feel bad seeking a partner for the pairing before I'm done. :c

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
which pairing anon? o: if it's a canon i'm into idc if you haven't finished

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
Tsukishima and Hinata from Haikyuu!! I could theoretically play either of them, but I think I'd be better at Tsukki.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
i have a shitton of word choice/usage pet peeves (and yeah i know my grammar in this comment is really bad, but i'm rarely buttmad over grammar errors.)

you used to do something, not use to. there are exceptions to this, but i get annoyed.
something "discreet" is subtle. "discrete" means separate (the t separates the Es).
it's not "a do" or "a due", it's ado
per se not per SAY
i.e. is for exact clarification ("that is"), e.g. provides an example
affect is a verb. effect is a NOUN, unless you're using it as in "to effect a change" (to implement a change)
difference between the prefixes dis- and un-
misheard common sayings
it's not "should of", it's "should have"
"could care less." if you COULDN'T care less, that means that you really don't care.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
oh, i thought of another one. you can be sorry for someone's loss (if someone has died) and you can be sorry for their lot (in life) but not their (parking) lots.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
"sorry for your lots" may be in reference to an internet meme though

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-is-babby-formed

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm truly sorry for your lots

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-25 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
that is a meme, dumbass.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
Actually it's couldn't care less. The meaning is meant to be you care so little that it is impossible to care less.

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/could-care-less-versus-couldnt-care-less

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
that's what i meant. "could care less" is the incorrect phrasing that bothers me.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, the wording made it seem otherwise, sorry!

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
all the artists on pixiv i love have suddenly leaped onto another fandom at one go and i'm so buttmad

sa

(Anonymous) 2015-03-24 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
wait, is this rp pet peeves? nevermind, ignore me

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-25 07:34 am (UTC)(link)
tired of people just talking about rp instead of actually doing any. plurk enables this since they get the thrill of people being excited over their plans and fallout without putting forth any of the work. decided tonight to no longer use plurk to talk about future plans myself so hope it helps.

Re: PETTY PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2015-03-26 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
don't do it anon. people don't like being surprised without consent.