United Cameridian Alliance
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 10:36 am (UTC)(link)That does seem a little PA to me.
Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)also it says CW, not TW - literally 'content warning'. content warnings aren't just for triggers, they're a heads up to anyone who would prefer not to read that content.
I think the addition of 'consent issues' is pushing it a little, but since he clearly didn't figure out what risks she would would actually be exposed to and since she didn't have the opportunity to make a fully informed choice about them, I can see why they figured better safe than sorry
Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)people and nitpicking i swear.
Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: http://walkingmeltdown.dreamwidth.org/7805.html?thread=871293#cmt871293
(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)and disclosure is generally a consent-related issue
in this specific case, the consequences were unintended but pretty dang forseeable and it was wrong for him not to give her the heads up, just like somebody with a potentially harmful STD ought to warn partners - and remember, she's from before radiation was even discovered, so it's not like she had a way to know what she was getting into in terms of the effects of radiation
if murder were labeling it non-con that would be super inaccurate and out of line, but 'issues' is vague and makes sense given the basically consensual but kinda messy circumstances
dont get me wrong, murder has done all kinds of shitty things, but I don't think erring on the side of warning a little too much is really one of them