United Cameridian Alliance
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS
GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

no subject
what a depressing thread to read.
+1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 02:20 am (UTC)(link)and i say that as someone who likes the game, but please don't pretend our anon culture hasn't been awful from the start. granted it's gotten better, but there was no reason for the whiteknight brigade to get summoned when people were pointing out concerns about how revisions were handled.
right or wrong, you guys made the game look like a bunch of assholes who can't stand a contrary opinion. shouting WHAT YOU THINK DOESN'T MATTER should've been the red flag to step back, seriously.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 02:27 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 03:13 am (UTC)(link)maybe we've lost some of those who were stirring the wank but it's just as likely that they're still in the game
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 03:17 am (UTC)(link)and if standards were this tight for revisions we're going to have more than a few
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 04:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 04:29 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 06:52 am (UTC)(link)and if that's the case they really need to step back and examine their priorities in life.
-1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 08:55 am (UTC)(link)i am in the 'lol who cares its just anon comms' boat, but its not really fair to expect everyone to not be bothered by criticism in a creative hobby, anon or not.
insecurity and creative hobbies tend to go hand in hand.
SA
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 09:01 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)because it's pretty obvious if someone doesn't approach you about a problem and instead just stirs wank they have no interest in ironing things out or making things work. they just don't want you around.
+1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)if it's on an anoncomm, it can't be crit. you can't even know if they're reading it ffs. it's just complaining.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2014-08-30 03:55 am (UTC)(link)