rpanons | United Cameridian Alliance

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

there was more than one that didn't fall under "small revisions" though and i'm getting that same inconsistent impression like from the last few rounds. if a lot of people are messing the same section up it might also mean that there's some confusing wording going on, or something else that just needs clarification that wasn't as clearly laid out as they assumed.

i'm not saying every single one of those apps didn't deserve a revision request, but looking over what they asked for i certainly wouldn't have handed out 14. that's a little ridiculous and doesn't bode too well for what might qualify as a flat out rejection.

powers have always been straight forward, and for teams there is no excuse why "pick two and explain them" should be confusing. unless you've seen the full apps you don't know the context. if you have legitimate concerns then you should take them to the mods, but they're the ones processing the applications. how you would do it doesn't matter, because it's not your game.

from what i've seen the revisions have always told the player what's missing, even if they're lengthy and imo that's better than saying it's not good enough or saying "your personality is lacking" and not explaining why.

the pick two teams thing was a recent update on the apps so it may be that the ones who received that revision were people who had the apps written up during the last app round and didn't notice the change

it's a player's responsibility to check for things like that

exactly

totally agreeing with you anon

just saying that's what it appears to be and is therefore understandable why something so simple was set up as a revision

yeah, I don't see them as excessive or nitpicky when they're important to the game setting

I would prefer a mod point out a dumb mistake to me than let it slide to make it easier, but to each their own

United Cameridian Alliance

no subject

no subject

da

no subject

+1

ayrt

ayrt