rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-05-02 06:10 pm

Nobody flicks me in the butt without my consent

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: PARADISA

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with most of this (I'm of the opinion that private group logs should count for everyone though, but if we got a comment count I would like to see OP only counts and you just use the threads in there). I don't want a reduced AC, I just want a damned minimum comment count. It can only *help* people to have a number, as I'm with you I think I have too seen people get shafted with the same number of comments (and I've been told one number would always get you a pass and seen people with that number get told it wasn't enough).

If this gets us *that* I'm okay with it, and that's really all I hope it gets us. Or at least opens up discussion about the topic to start with, which it has done at least here.