Do your taxes
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
CONCERNS | RESOURCES
Navigate:
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS
USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)For me, there's a challenge in writing a character like this because it seems pretty easy to fill up a character background/persona with a lot of weird shit and flaws and quirks and a crazy detailed fictional setting, but a lot harder to take a character that is representative of a nonfictional majority and is otherwise pretty nondescript, and somehow make him interesting. And then I run into people who go 'bawww poor suburban middle class white man has ~problems~' or 'I'm never going to tag a whitebread-looking character because they're so boring'.
Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)if people accuse you of glorifying him when you're just treating him as an average person, well, they're the ones that have issues, not you.
Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 03:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)design-wise, i care more if the character has a decent concept, engaging personality and well-designed background.
are people saying "baw whities" to your face, or in places you stumble across?
Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)I think I've actually been less likely to have sustained interest with a character that made me go 'oh look X!' because it's easy to bank on an obvious gimmick that makes them stand out, only to find out that they're actually not really well-developed past that.
Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)you'll never get all the people to love all your ocs all the time. if you're still concerned you could ask your friends to critique your oc, but you're better served by focusing on making a good character than worrying that someone somewhere might not tag you.
Re: OC
(Anonymous) 2013-04-10 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OC