rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-04-03 07:51 pm

The kid just rages for a while

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
weird kinks, things that generally don't fly in games for whatever reasons, your super obscure otp, self-indulgent AUs, etc

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
i'd be up for playing a line where my villainous character is challenged by another through common interest. at first, this interest of theirs may kick off a deep seated rivalry or dick measuring contest of douchebaggery, but when they realise that they can use the other/manipulate them into gaining what they want, they start working together for convenience's sake.

they both remain hideously cruel in how they plan to end the other, but the obstacles that get in their way cause them to reexamine their relationship and just exactly what they actually want from each other! can be either gen or romantic, either way is cool.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
oh! and i'm not sure that i would get this because it's hard to find characters in my canon, hahaha. and because my character would be terrible in a romantic relationship.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
want the shit out of that

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
want the shit out of that

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)
i want my character to sleep around with everyone

(they're not in a sex game)

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm with you, anon. I played a female character that uses sex as a coping mechanism and I eventually had to retire her, because playing her in games and having to handwave NPC sex and not having that fulfilling emotional give-and-take that came from her using people to fill the void in her life was making it hard on me to explore her character as fully as I wanted.

The worst part is I don't even like writing smut. I just wanted to do a lot of pre-smut and after-smut threads and have intense CR with all of these men she's used and the fallout of it.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 10:28 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure why that's a problem. I have a character who's a sex addict in a non-sex game. No one cares, because they have a ton of non-sexual CR. I don't always play out the smut, but that's more to save time and cut corners.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
- selfcest

- my OTP. i technically have two but they're both cross-canon and obscure, so i'm confident that saying it outright would give me away. i've never seen anyone ever actively play the other half for more than a couple of months so i've kind of given up anyway. :(

- yeah, some self-indulgent AUs, but i'd like to get to know the player and character before setting any of those up just to make the process of worldbuilding and relation building smoother.

- role-reversal (big buff burly man talks tough but ends up bottoming to a smaller partner. preference for f/m). male bondage and orgasm denial a bonus. i just never seem to have the right luck with my CR or if i do, the thread gets dropped before it gets to the good parts of actual role-reversal. femdomming, age differences, gun/weapon kink, voyeurism from a hidden third party, whipping or spanking or bondage also optional.

- physical torture (not necessarily sexual). not to the extreme of guro but electrocution, cutting, burning, humiliation, etc. i want a really nasty interrogation or kidnapping scene where they're beaten within an inch of their life.

- character death in a game where character death is permanent and with a character that has extensive/lots of important cr in the game. in the same vein, playing a villain who kills another character in a game where death is permanent and the villain actually gets negative consequences for it, or the consequences last longer than a week before everyone forgets and moves on.

- character corruption. turning a good or morally questionable character into some sick and twisted version of what they once were. puppeteering, a character being controlled by a malevolent force and turning against their CR unwillingly or willingly, hopefully to dramatic and devastating effect. again, ideally with negative consequences. wouldn't mind if they eventually figured out it wasn't their fault but still had broken trust/PTSD or something subtle and longer-lasting from it that makes their current CR a little more tense.

there's probably more...

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
on the last three points. a corruption line would be brilliant!

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
"physical torture (not necessarily sexual). not to the extreme of guro but electrocution, cutting, burning, humiliation, etc. i want a really nasty interrogation or kidnapping scene where they're beaten within an inch of their life."

augh same

the worst part is i only really want it with two specific characters and i've only ever seen one person play the other one and well. i can't exactly pm them out of the blue for this can i.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 17:23 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
physical torture (not necessarily sexual). not to the extreme of guro but electrocution, cutting, burning, humiliation, etc. i want a really nasty interrogation or kidnapping scene where they're beaten within an inch of their life.

Oh man I actually have a villain I'd love to have do this to someone

Fuck yes nasty interrogation or kidnapping

It's not really her MO but I can see her doing it if it needs to be done

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
-my canonically flirtatious and charming character actually being treated as though they were charming instead of all characters being belligerent and immune to them omg pervert I'm on to you
-a ship that gets together and the other mun plays out the little everyday things in the relationship instead of going AWOL to pursue other ships and leaving me to handwave everything

these actually shouldn't be rare but fuck me if I can get it to happen

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-04 21:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 02:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
au with a community/dexter crossover, lol my life.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
stockholm syndrome

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-04 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
filthy violent selfcest :c

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-04 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
people always have these kids/teens in their first relationship and like. they're just naturally a good kisser/give great bjs/whatever

i want way too much tongue, not knowing where to put their hands, accidentally biting, popping an awkward boner and having to go take a cold shower, and just generally not knowing what the fuck to do. bonus points for mistakenly assuming that someone is going for the dick/in for the kiss/to cop a feel and "meeting them halfway" or getting way too into it

+1!!!!!!

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 14:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
to have my villain be like the uncle scar to somebody's simba -- someone who did something horrible but made the other person think it was their fault, and emotionally blackmail them into helping him do what he wants (which is usually more horrible stuff. but IT'S OKAY because this is the only way 'simba' can make up for what he did!!)

i have a castmate with whom this exact situation can be played out but i'm forever a lone canon warrior. :(

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 01:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
I desperately want to play out one of my favorite pairings from my favorite canons but it has a lot of roadblocks.

-it's f/f, and I don't want to be seen as a neckbeard
-not a lot of players from the canon, and the only big cast I know of doesn't have either of the characters in the pairing and I can't app into the cast anyway.
-only one or two people play one half of the pairing and I'm the only person I know of that's even played the other half that's still in DWRP.
-I have stronger "voices" for other characters from the canon, including one half's fandom preferred love interest.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 02:43 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 16:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 16:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
My character getting married and raising a family in a game setting (ideally with adopted apped-into-game children). The one I wanna do this with is too young to be thinking about this yet, though. ):

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
a naïve good guy character being corrupted by a scheming villain to the point where they do villainous shit without thinking about it. without the entire game crying out "BUT NO THAT GUY'S EVIL I CAN JUST TELL"

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
A hero and a villain from the same canon in a game. Villain arrives first, successfully manages to paint themselves as the good guy and the hero as the bad guy. Hero arrives second, ends up ostracized and in the role of the villain.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 06:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-07 10:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
-Echoing an anon above, but character corruption. I play a 'good guy' type character, upstanding, honorable for the most part and morally pretty upright and devoted, but one with obvious chinks in his mental and emotional armor that were never fully exploited by plot aside from a few 'what if's' nudged at in the canon, and I felt kind of cheated. The right blows to his psyche and personal life could twist him into a nice puppet for the right manipulator. Stockholm syndrome is completely possible here with the right manipulation and time given how devoted he is prone to being.

-shameless AUs. I want more of these, whatever can be thought up, picked up and developed the heck out of.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 06:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if this counts, because I MIGHT get to some day, but probably not. I'd really love it if someone evil discovered my character's sort of literal inner darkness (something almost like demonic possession, but he's in control most of the time), and tried to take advantage of it. Like, figuring out what buttons to push and manipulating him until he succumbed to it.

And then I want him to be restored through the power of friendship (and possibly a more literal battle), regaining control of himself and kicking whatever villain's but with his friends.

And THEN I want hurt/comfort from the fallout.

I am aware of how much skill it would take to pull this off without descending into unacceptable amounts of wangst (there'd probably be some, Idk if it could be fully avoided), and I don't even know if I could do it. But I can dream.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
- A polyamorous relationship. Either with all members dating each other or one person dating several, the former preferred.

- Two villains entering a sexual relationship with both trying to control the other. Lots of hate-sex. Lying, betrayal, you name it.

- Obsession. Really, really unhealthy obsession. One sided or mutual.

Re: SHIT YOU WANT TO PLAY OUT BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) - 2013-04-05 05:52 (UTC) - Expand