rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2012-02-07 07:22 pm

007

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.


Temporary Change: To reduce the strain on Dreamwidth's servers new entries will go up when a post reaches 3,000. It doesn't look like DW can handle 5,000 comment entries at the moment so please refrain from spamming so we can stretch these entries for a little longer. We don't need several threads soliciting photo evidence of body parts, and we already know that we only care about yaoi. Failure to comply will only result in deletions and butthurt. "People may notice site slowdown/cache error pages. We're working on fixing. You can help: finish posts at 3k comments, not 5k or more." - Dreamwidth@Twitter

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.


Concerns?


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
Would anybody be interested in a 'Lone Canon Warrior' game?

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
In theory it's an interesting idea but how in the world are you going to enforce that? "Only one character from any given canon at a time" would just be a really weird rule...

da

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
but imagine how happy it would make the people who hate popular canons

another da

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's so much as for 'people who hate popular canons' as 'people who enjoy playing from obscure canons but end up never being tagged'.

pa

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i see that it's not the intent of the op, but it could also work out for the people i mentioned

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
is there anyone who actually DOES hate all popular canons? maybe i'm sheltered or something but that just sounds like elitist ~special snowflake~ bullshit.

pa

(Anonymous) 2012-02-11 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
some anons do, to judge by some of the threads we had back on lj. i've never talked to one non-anon who admitted to it, though. maybe they are just ~special snowflakes~ :p

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I'm interested

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
I think the same ic effect could be achieved with an amnesia/au game. It doesn't necessarily have to be ONLY ONE CHARACTER PER CANON.

I just can't see a game of only ~lone canon warriors~ working. If it were an actually interesting game, it'd be really frustrating for almost everyone that wanted to apply.

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it COULD be achieved with amnesia/au. Maybe some people would play it that way, but a lot of people would oocly make their character interact more with or gravitate to their own castmates, either just because they love/know more about the canon or because they want to experiment with the way the relationship or opinions of each other could be different with such a different 'first' meeting.

In a lone canon warrior game, every popular or obscure canon would be on even footing from the start, without more obscure characters having to work twice as hard for half as much results.

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Because no one would gravitate towards the lone canon warrior representation of popular canons they like.

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
No shit, but it would still be a more even footing. People wouldn't be able to hang out entirely by canon; characters that would ICly only involve themselves with canonmates would HAVE to tag others or just stay completely by themselves; because it would be a lone canon warrior game, people would be more likely to app obscure canons and would thus be more likely to tag OTHER obscure canons.

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right, and I've got another idea. No one is allowed to tag anyone they know OOCly.

That way, people wouldn't hang out just based upon OOC social groups, players who don't know anyone OOCly would have a better chance of gaining valuable CR with people who might otherwise stay together, and it would encourage people to branch out with new and exotic characters they might otherwise wouldn't try.

Oh! Here's another one. Require people to tag a certain amount of new people in order to pass AC. If they tag the same five people, they get warned, and if they don't meet a certain number of new people they get dropped.

I've got another idea! Also, we should require people to app from an obscure canon. Have it so that they're allowed one semi-popular canon but have to balance that with, say, 3-4 different characters from obscure canons.

Re: The 'Lone Canon Warrior' game

(Anonymous) 2012-02-12 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
sigh