rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2012-05-16 11:17 pm

[D] Mwah

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.


Temporary Change: To reduce the strain on Dreamwidth's servers new entries will go up when a post reaches 3,000. Please refrain from spamming so we can stretch these entries for a little longer. We don't need several threads soliciting photo evidence of body parts, and we already know that we only care about yaoi. Failure to comply will only result in deletions and butthurt. "People may notice site slowdown/cache error pages. We're working on fixing. You can help: finish posts at 3k comments, not 5k or more." - Dreamwidth@Twitter

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


Concerns?


Navigate:

Hey! Do not post anything outside of these threads. It will be deleted.
Go be cute and fun and fun and funny over here.

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
There was also the whole... someone had a problem and everyone BLAMED QU on it thing a post or two back? Remember?

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 07:58 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I remember. That was that anon stirring shit as usual IIRC. They seem to think as long as they don't mention her by name, it absolves them from being grudgewanky. When it's obvious that, every time, they're pretty much talking about her. Also something about getting justice for all the people wronged by fictional gay.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh huh. Looking at the thread, an anti gay troll whined about pairings and everyone jumped to the conclusion it was Qu or grudgewank. The wank they even brought up involved another person entirely AND was a lot more recent than whatever, so...?

Methinks the people who can't let go of the grudgewank are the ones who keep bringing it and Qu into unrelated discussions.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Because the same troll has repeatedly whined about the same thing and all roads in the discussion lead to Qu. This has been going on for over a year.

Methinks you've failed to shift the goalposts, anon.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
No. The wank they brought up involved Qu, and I am baffled as to why everyone thinks otherwise? Anon even admitted as much.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Just because Qu does there does not mean it involved her.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
>Anon is complaining broadly about yaoi lovers buttsexing too much
>Anon brings up a situation when questioned that involved Qu as an example of how the "straight players" get persecuted
>Qu is brought up from this because this situation directly involved her, and "her character was the one the player was stoned for not shipping with"
>Anon doesn't deny that she was one of who Anon was talking about, and then names three other names, two of which don't even ship or play M/M at all, and were more than likely just names asspulled at random

Even if you're right, and it wasn't specifically written with Qu alone in mind, it still managed to find its way back to her because they decided to pick out one of the dramafests at Route as an example.

It's also true that this has happened in more than one anon post before, when anon(s) seemed to think they could wank on her without outwardly mentioning her name because that somehow meant they weren't talking about her.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Unless Qu was the one doing the stoning, I'm still not understanding what Qu has to do with that.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty sure she was accused of it, because the whole cast was getting anonymously harassed at the same time all of this was going on, especially the one player in question. Don't ask me whether it's true or not.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? That might explain it if it were true, but even the anon seemed adamant about it not being about her.

If it was her though... wow.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
The whole cast included her too, though.

All I know is, it was a huge clusterfuck of mutually awful behavior leading to awful treatment leading to awful harassment leading to more awful behavior on all sides, that somehow managed to seem more like a character or ship dispute rather than a handful of individuals not getting along well in and out of character.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
... Wait, I'm confused. It sounds like you're talking about the players from then too now?

sa

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 08:03 am (UTC)(link)
And anon, I must say, that's some pretty creative reading comprehension you have there!

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. You really do believe that don't you? That is messed up.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-18 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Aw, and you tried so hard to approach the same wank from a new angle!

/pinches cheeks