socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2023-11-25 07:13 pm

oh, dreamwidth park is lonely in the dark/all the horny memes have no tag-outs

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES

ANON HOLIDAY GIFT THREAD


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Re: MEMES YOU WANT TO SEE

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
A Soul Eater meme. Weapon and Meister AUs plz

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I did 2-4 sentences per answer and my whole app fit into one comment. I was sweating a bit when I heard people say "multiple sections".

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
Tbh I wouldn't be surprised if cutting out the clearly bad/OOC apps as well as apps that didn't fulfill a specific criteria brought us down enough for the mods to go "we're close enough to 100, we'll accept the couple people over 100" or something.

Re: PB SUGGESTIONS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
Male
In his late 20's to his early 40's (novel gives us some range to play with)
Freckles
Glasses
Thick, curly black-brown hair
Olive complexion

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
This is so weird to me. Open/Poly has kind of been the thing in sex games for a while (and it's easier to go along with it in a sex game where you're encouraged to have smut threads with many people), but I always assume monogamous in non-smut games unless the character is canonically poly/into open relationships.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
i can't see any mod team doing that, i think they'll stick to the 100. anything else risks starting wank

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 07:30 am (UTC)(link)
i think going against their own rules right out of the gate would open them up to wank and people trying to bend other rules, so i'm certain that they'll keep to the 100 cap. they already said that this round's cap didn't mean next round's applicants would be limited to the number of players who drop. i think that solidifies them planning on sticking to their guns.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
i think the only time going over cap makes sense is when it's like, you have a cap of 100 and only get 102 apps and decide to accept everyone. that i have seen happen a few times before. 40 over is a lot so i wouldn't expect it here.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
yeah. i also don't see almost 40 apps being bad or ooc enough to bring them to cap

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 08:29 am (UTC)(link)
seconding this recc. it's one of the few series i've seen that in addition to having its own plot that doesn't fit in with the cookie cutter versions of a lot of series, it has an amazing cast compilation as well. the story runs along smoothly through it all and you love and hate a lot of characters. it also ends on its own note. i'm thinking of a rewatch myself.

orphan black was also one of my favorites for series that had its own bent and amazing cast/story.

for movies, i'd be suggesting 'older' ones, since they were actually some of my faves too. the bone collector, along came a spider, pelican brief, se7en, double jeopardy, the client, the fugitive. if you wind up liking those, there's always a lot more in the 90s/00s that meet your criteria that stand the test of time.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
agreed. accepting 100 out of 140 means sticking to their stated plan even if it means rejecting some good apps. accepting 102 means telling 38 players they are crap.

even if they are, making 38 people feel hurt or mad at you would not be a promising start to a game.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
I saw one player say they had to split it over THREE comments. I will be shocked if this mod team survives this level of interest for more than a few months. even after they get through this app round they'll be running a game of 100 players out of the gate and that's a lot of work. I hope they hire on some new mods asap.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't play in sex games but open/polyamorous relationships have been more or less treated as the default in every game I've joined in the last several years. Like there would have to be a discussion about being monogamous, it wasn't just assumed. There's been a noticeable shift in DWRP as a whole and I sympathize with everyone who's had bad experiences, currently dealing with one myself. Love the player I'm shipping with, it's the other players whose characters are also dating theirs that are the nightmares. They've been so shitty to me in so many small, weird, manipulative ways it makes me feel crazy bringing up my concerns to the player I'm shipping with, who's basically 🤷 about it all anyway. :(

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)
da who's played ships outside sex games here, and not in any games at the moment - this is the first I'm hearing of such a trend, and I would usually assume monogamy by default as ayrt said. That sounds like a messy situation you're in, I'm sorry to hear (read) that.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
but it's a player cap, isn't it? it might be that some of the 140 apps are from players who applied more than one character too, and that could bring down the actual number of contenders. there were definitely people who reserved multiple characters!

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
most of the multiapps are in the same line.

eg;
1. bob - bob the builder
2. catra - she-ra
3. usagi - sailor moon/link - legend of zelda

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
this seems a bit presumptuous given that we don't even know how big the mod team is right now. they've already tweaked and adjusted dates to accommodate for the surge of interest too

Re: GAME IDEAS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
yes please!
myrmidon: ([mu;] i did something bad.)

icon commissions @ axisandallies

[personal profile] myrmidon 2023-12-31 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
SAMPLES



COMMISSIONS
Icon commissions are NOW OPEN at [community profile] axisandallies! See commission post for pricing and order details.

(frozen comment) Re: APPS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
would rather not have mina/silver of 'avoid mentioning underage character's age to dodge player's boundaries so they would smut with her' fame in a smut game tbh

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Same here, anon. I've definitely seen a shift - most games I've been over the past few years had a few open relationships or triads in them, when that used to be much more of a rarity - but monogamous ships have still been the majority.

Wildly different RP corners, I guess?

(frozen comment) Re: APPS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
did you bring this issue up to the mods, or did you just want this random anon to feel bad for positively mentioning whoever this is?

Re: op here with more questions

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel bizarrely lucky reading this thread because I've done multiple poly ships across various games and it all went fine. Most were open relationships, but two were triads - coordinating three-person threads could get tricky, but not so much that it got frustrating.

I lean more towards slow burn myself, since a lot of my characters struggle with intimacy for various reasons, but that also gives characters more times to catch feelings about more people. Sometimes it's fun to chase where that goes, depending on who the characters are. (And I've had things get really tense or complicated IC, which was delicious for me, but only because everyone OOC was communicative and respectful and didn't blur those lines.)

(frozen comment) Re: APPS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
thanks for not telling us which character that is

(frozen comment) Re: APPS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
--> wankgate
--> also why aren't you reporting this to the mods if you've got deets wtf