socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2023-11-25 07:13 pm

oh, dreamwidth park is lonely in the dark/all the horny memes have no tag-outs

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES

ANON HOLIDAY GIFT THREAD


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Re: GAME IDEAS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
omg anon i have wanted this so bad i was putting together one of my own. i have never enjoyed or been good at bakerstreet type "individual meme" posts, i miss dressingrooms and sandboxes.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
you can get a good sense for who is going to be a source of self-sustaining fun in this game

this is it and how apps should be done.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
it's easy enough when you have clearly bad apps and oocness, but once you're down to the majority of okay and good apps, picking out the best ones becomes challenging because you're faced with having to compare different characters from different canons of different genres.

you can absolutely take what fits for the game you want to run, or take the apps of characters you'd enjoy tagging more, or employ a number of different criteria, but that's different from taking the best apps based on quality, which was what i interpreted the mods were after, based on their plurk comments.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
ime both phenomenal and godawful apps generally represent outliers and most apps are average and similar in quality. you can start looking at other factors, like whether you have a good enough variety of characters, whether this character or that one would be a better fit for the game or facilitate plot progression more easily - but that's already moving away from choosing the best apps based on quality.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
i mean tbf it's not exactly like the mods would baldly state that they're gonna pick who they want based on how fun they personally think an applicant would be in their game (not without setting off a flurry of wank anyway lol)

but lbr just because they don't say it doesn't mean they're not, in fact, going to end up factoring those things into what they mean by "quality". if i were them then at that point i probably would

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
i'd probably factor in things like how much people tagged around or kept threads going on the tdm, too. just factors of who would carry the game momentum the most for the first month. but honestly we're not gonna know the factors and it'll always vary game to game!

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
the survey q's are taken right off a myers-briggs personality type quiz website yea

https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
... is it different? Honestly asking here. You may be taking this too literally. Best apps can encompass what suits their game, the type of writing they want to cultivate (ecats vs heavier log-based), what types fit with their premise, etc. I'm sure they wouldn't fully detail everything they're looking for on plurk.

It comes down to selecting based on how quickly people slam in their apps when apps open or selecting based on quality which require reading them all and selecting 'the best' or the ones that resonate. It's typically the former these days (which I've always personally disliked but that's neither here nor there) which tends to be easier for mods since it's not up to them, just go by who was the quickest and as long as the app isn't horrendous that's that.

Sure, there will probably be a point where some apps are around the same level as far as quality goes. That doesn't mean that it's apples to oranges though. If I remember right they even said on plurk that if you don't get in it doesn't mean your app was bad. There has to be a line somewhere, 100 is already generous for a round.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
that also makes me think they're new, to be honest, because a more experienced team would have publicly said they'd be picking the apps that show characters with the best mix of characterization and game suitability, to minimize the chance of wank afterward.

to be clear, i'm really not trying to put the mods down when i say i suspect they're new, nor do i have anything against new mods. i genuinely hope they get the game off the ground and have a good time running it. there are just some subtle tells that make me think they haven't done this before.

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly this.

Current DWRP is so used to 'first come first serve, i know you'll accept what I shat out quickly as an app because it's passable, it doesn't matter how much I cared while working on it i got it in first' because that's been the status quo for years. It's become the standard even in capped games.

I also get the new mods sense but in a good way. They're changing it up and flexing what they're doing based on their bandwidth and they're trying to be fair from what I've seen. Shrugs. It's nice to see different.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
yeah milk has games down to a science after starting and ditching so many of them

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
it is different, imo! they said they'd take the best apps in terms of quality and referenced writing quality and characterization. adding in fit, suitability, outreach and suitability is absolutely fair, and they should curate the playerbase that best aligns with the game they want to run, but that's no longer exclusively picking out the apps of the best quality, as outlined in their plurks. again, i'm really not against their picking out the apps that they want or find the best based on a multitude of factors. i'm just saying that saying they'd pick the apps of the best characterization and writing quality to me hints they haven't reviewed apps in bulk before, and so i suspect they're new mods.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Alright, agree to disagree then! I don't personally see a difference and don't expect that much clarification when I don't need it but everyone has a different take.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
that's a very fair take, anon, and i could absolutely be off base with my guess that they're new mods!

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
I actually don't think you're wrong, I think they're on the newer end myself! My pov is mainly let's not take everything they may have noted on plurk to the letter, as we're all human and there's a good chance that while they're judging by characterization and examples that they're taking other elements into consideration as well (if only because that logically makes sense). And that it's not crazy to judge based on quality in general haha.

Also, it's plurk. It's meant for quick responses. Maybe a FAQ inquiry would've been better for harder specifics?

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
da

tbh i wouldn't even know what a phenomenal app looks like. Most apps (in general) to me look decent because they get the important points across. I'd only consider an app bad if it was unnecessarily wordy and hard to parse, or if it's too unintelligible to read.

Mods are going to have a hard time ranking, that's for sure.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
tbh i hope they're new, we need more people willing to run the games they want to run

doesn't really matter either way though

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
i probably didn't articulate myself well in my original comment, but i don't think it's bad if it does turn out that they're new mods or anything like that. i just think they're new because imo a more experienced team would have gotten burned before and disclaimed they'd be picking apps based off characterization and writing quality as well as suitability and activity, both for practicality reasons and to avoid wank. that's just my personal interpretation!

but if they are new mods, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that in my book: new mods can bring fresh perspectives and ways of doing things, and i'm happy i threw my hat in the ring and apped either way.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
Ah........ so it's "they're bright-eyed, rosy-cheeked and don't yet know the horrors"

Yeah I can agree with that.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
at least it's just a round cap! which is understandable given the amount.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
If I don't get in, I'll tighten up my app and keep tagging the TDM. I've got amazing threads going on there, it'll tide me over until next month. Mods are doing a fantastic job, I hope they take the time to rest and take care of themselves.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, on one hand: yes, and that's how I would handle being tagged once by someone who I didn't want to play with on a meme.

On the other hand, in the context of this thread, once someone has tagged you and been ignored enough times that you find it weird and off-putting that they're not getting the message, it's clearly time to send a "I'm not interested in playing with you, please don't tag me" PM. For whatever reason, they don't understand that, so direct communication is necessary.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
i play only on memes and personally: idk and idc

people flake on me, i flake on them, we tag each other again or we dont. life goes on.

the only time flaking becomes an issue for me is if someone close to me is constantly promising me stuff and getting me hyped and never delivering. if its just piddly little meme threads then w/e
forherkingdom: (Default)

M/F - royalty, corruption etc. (can go either way) / good end & bad end options

[personal profile] forherkingdom 2023-12-31 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
A: breeding princess - royal advisor betrays and corrupts princess into a breeding slave for his uses.

kinks: virginity loss and focus on virginity/defiled purity, humiliation, noncon to dubcon through aphro, manipulation, aspects of mind control/bimbofication, breeding and bdsm. dirty talk (especially forcing her to admit she's enjoying it), facefucking, double/triple penetration, orgasm control, denial and forced orgasms. use of toys and magic. open to a lot of options for this and going lighter vs darker etc. depending on your tastes. i have very few limits and am pretty flexible if there's more you'd like to bring to the table.

I really want the focus to be on her servicing him and the mix of humiliation and pleasure she gets from it. this will never be full consent and she'll resent him and be disgusted by all of it, no matter what. bonus if she's secretly fantasized about something like this, to her own horror, adding to her shame that it's actually happening and he seems to know about it.

B: rescue options - hero saves princess, and helps her heal (or in turn she might corrupt him!)

kinks i would like to include: sex as "payment" for saving her, sex addiction, lack of boundaries, facefucking, double/triple penetration, somno, orgasm control, denial and forced orgasms. use of toys. magic optional, maybe the aphro/mind control rubs off on him when he touches her.

I really want the focus to be on her servicing him and the immense pleasure she gets from it. Her not understanding boundaries and assuming he's super into it whether he is or reluctant because he knows it's wrong and she's not in her right mind. So noncon/dubcon/consensual on his part totally flexible. This could be someone she knew before, or a total stranger intent on saving her. again, open to other ideas, if there's more you want to explore. age and relationship etc of M all up to you!

Also open to the rescue attempt failing and M being imprisoned with F, instead of/after escaping.

Super flexible on a lot of this if you have other ideas. no scat, guro, underage. looking to play the princess, if that wasn't obvious. PM this account to discuss details!

tl;dr for anyone interested.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 05:44 am (UTC)(link)
If you like crime thrillers with a touch of supernatural in it, "Fringe" is fantastic. It is 5 seasons long (96 episodes all together, each episode about 45 minutes), but the end of each season has it's own payoff that feels satisfying. Also the first season follows the formula of "most of the episode is dedicated to it's own specific mystery, and then there's 1 or 2 small details that tie into the overarching plot", so you can watch the first 3 or 4 episodes to see if you like it before continuing on.