socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2023-11-25 07:13 pm

oh, dreamwidth park is lonely in the dark/all the horny memes have no tag-outs

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not post personal information. This includes but is not limited to full names, addresses, phone numbers and so on.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.
Do not solicit money, Dreamwidth points, or other currency unless you are offering a good or service in return.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES

ANON HOLIDAY GIFT THREAD


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP | RP COMMISSIONS

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
yes. generally if my tag-in is ignored once on a meme, i'll give the player the benefit of the doubt. lots of reasons they might not have come back to it. ignored twice? i assume they don't want to write with me.

exception being if they ignore my first tag-in while tagging everyone else's on the same toplevel. that couldn't be clearer, no second attempt there.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
It feels good to be named.

It feels even better to be named next to so many excellent players. Thank you for the double compliment, I hope to play with you there!

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
like lmf, what, do we need to send rejection notices to strangers on memes

'dear [character name here],

i received a number of tagins for [my character here], and i've decided to move forward with a different tagger

although your tagin demonstrated your experience and grasp of character well, [insert reason for not tagging]

thank you for your interest in tagging [my character here] and taking the time to write a tagin. i wish you the best of luck with your cr search.

regards, [my character name]'s player'

and tbh, i'm a big believer in talking to people but jfc, i also feel like there's a lot of people here who can't catch a hint. it's like if they're caught in a saw trap and the way to not die is to figure out the person who never tags them back, EVER, doesn't want to tag them, they'd die screaming 'idk what's going on why don't people talk to each other???'

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you! I hope we get to play together!

Re: APPS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for mentioning my character, anon! You're too kind. I hope to play with you in game if we both get in!
flair: (Default)

[personal profile] flair 2023-12-30 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
of course anon!! there you go, and i hope the coming year brings you much good cheer c:

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
hopefully there aren't too many apps with an insane amount of tl;dr for the survey portion

Re: GAME IDEAS

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Not strictly a game, but I'm gauging interest in a sandbox comm. It doesn't seem to be a thing we have anymore. Nothing elaborate, just a place to put up a post as a starter or open posts with settings. Probably a weekly/monthly event post. A tag system for 'verses. Simple stuff. To make life easier for everyone, pre-ban anyone already banned from bakerstreet/fortanon.

Not sure if memes have entirely superseded this kind of play or if other people are craving it the way I am.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah i don't want to be shitty, but when i saw people say they had to split the survey portion alone into multiple replies because it was so long, i couldn't help wondering if they were badly overdoing it....

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
oh wow

i am pretty sure they only wanted 1-3 sentences max to explain the choice for their ref. i definitely saw an app that put more into the survey than the other sections too

survey looks ripped from a psych quiz so i assume they're plugging characters into that to sort

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
not me over here laughing if one of the mods criteria was 'if survey is too excessive, immediate rejection'. padding an app or not knowing how to be succinct would be reason enough in my bod book to reject.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
less is more sometimes its true

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
me too, but it would be kind of us to state that up front lol

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
i have a feeling they're new mods who got way more than they bargained for

really hope they take care of themselves and rest and relax their brains and eyes

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
they're definitely new mods, based on the fact that they thought they could pick out the 100 best apps. it shows they don't have a lot of experience with app review, because they'd otherwise have realized that you can't really compare what makes a good app for character A from canon B, versus character X from canon Y, it's apples and oranges.

i definitely hope they pace themselves and don't burn out, this kind of turnout can be a mixed blessing. but it's been great seeing the excitement, and they're off to a good start!

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
i actually think the sheer amount of html in the application probably contributed to this. i don't think i write very long applications but i had to struggle to cut down things because my normal 1-comment app length wouldn't fit in 1 comment with all the html also included. the apps look great, don't get me wrong, but the html pads the length a lot.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
html definitely contributes

depending on how fancy you get it can pad by a thousand or more characters, comment limit is 16000

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, the html by itself is 3.5k. getting to 16k wasn't that difficult.

Re: RP WOES

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
A tale as old as time and a very Basic woe. I want to ship and the character is already in a ship ingame

And none of my friends are posting to rplove for me to compliment them and it feels weird to cold call with a random private plurk with what I'd say on the meme

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2023-12-30 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

like anon above, I don't think about being ignored once, but twice i interpret as not wanting to play. you could maybe use a three strikes rule, but definitely not any more than that.

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
I think you can, if your criteria is to weed out people who need a lot of mod handholding, can't articulate clearly what their character is, or will be so resistant to the setting that they never fit in, and their samples read like stale wonder bread with no distinguishing characteristics besides the icon used and the name.

I agree that quality is difficult at face value when you have sources that are light on some details while other material is practically dripping with them, but you can get a good sense for who is going to be a source of self-sustaining fun in this game.

Re: RP WOES

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
omg i hate making icons so much
why am i doing this

Re: THE GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
Huh? You can definitely pick out good apps from a group, especially if sample threads come into play. Take what fits for the game you want to run.

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
yeah i don't get this, to me it sounds like the mods are also trying to curate the game to their tastes rather than just accepting the bare minimum of anyone who apps. it's their game, they can set the standard for quality.

+1

(Anonymous) 2023-12-31 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
quality can be hard to gauge, but it's absolutely doable and the way apps should be done, especially with the first app round to set the standards of the game going forward. I honestly don't know what other options there would be aside from just accepting the first 100 players regardless of quality (which is bad) or not have a cap at all (also bad).

how well it gets executed is an entirely different question, but in concept it's definitely not a 'lol foolish noob mods' decision.