socksuke_uchiha ([personal profile] socksuke_uchiha) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2020-05-12 07:47 pm

[moans]

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

-1

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
or maybe some people do get targeted for no reason. wg is not the arbiter of who is "toxic". one person being annoying to you does not mean they annoy everyone else or that they're even irredeemably awful, but wg being taken as fact can sure make it seem that way.

not everyone namedropped, even repeatedly, is at fault on a comm that takes petty shit too seriously and then memes the fuck out of it. but nice victim blaming.

(frozen comment) Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You want to point out what "victims" have been through this in recent memory? The only ones I see getting wanked to the ends of the earth are the likes of Snow and Ink.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
eh, there are definitely c and d level obnoxious people whose names come up a lot. i don't want to say those names because i don't want the thread to devolve, so namedropping them more really isn't necessary.

then there are people like that jamie person who likely isn't innocent but may also not be worth that much discussion and drama. i.e. going to the mods of a new game, pitchforks raised.

(frozen comment) no

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
i am not dragging more namedropping into this bullshit. you are dodging and trying to obfuscate the point. wg is not some righteous bastion of toxic outing, sorry.

(frozen comment) +100000

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
da and good call, anon. you did not take the bait.

(frozen comment) Re: no

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It was an honest question but ok.

(frozen comment) dda

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
there was no way a question like that was genuine. you wanted them to name names so you could dig up reasons as to why it doesn't count. you wanted them to name names so you can go over a laundry list of all the petty bullshit that gets brought up about those names and pin it on them as justification for harassment.

it's not an honest question. don't pretend it was.

(frozen comment) Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
here we go with anons making up head canons for other anons again

(frozen comment) Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
how is recognizing the pattern of how these discussions always break down "head canon"ing?

if you can't tell a bad actor when you see one, i feel sorry for you.

(frozen comment) dda

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
no it wasn't, you fucking shitstirrer. you get an F and you can take an L while you're at it.

+1

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Things people have been named and shamed over on wg include being too flaky, being too active, being considered unapproachable, preferring ships or smut over gen, being ooc, being a public mod, being an anonymous mod, having opinions on game mechanics, being heavily involved in game plots, and getting into inconsequential arguments on plurk and/or discord.

none of those things are toxic.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2020-06-04 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
i was once brought up on wankgate because a family vacation overlapped with someone viciously ragging on another player in wankgate, and that...somehow meant it was me doing it?

i had never spoken to the player or interacted with them either oocly or icly and had in fact been offline the entire time focusing on my fun family vacation so i have no idea why they decided i was actually spending my time attacking them when i had zero reason to do so.