rpanons | [moans]

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER | GENERAL DWRP QUESTIONS

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

who is harley? i've been in dwrp since the migration from lj and i have no idea who this is.

it's possible that the mods don't know who these people are either. you say "known wanker" like everybody who plays here knows who everybody is. but that's not true.

did whoever reported these people to the mods provide deets or just "heads up, this person was banned from a game once." because i wouldn't act on the latter and i wouldn't spend all my free time trying to play internet detective either. if you know somebody's a problem and you have proof, you need to bring that to the mods. not give warnings with no evidence and then expect mods, who are spending their time trying to get a game running, to instead shift through a bunch of anon comm posts looking for stuff.

not for nothing but if i'm a mod and i actually care about my game and my prospective player base and someone says "so and so got banned from a game" and gives me nothing else to work with i'm going to raise my eyebrows and be frustrated and take it with huge grain of salt, of course, but i'm also going do my due diligence and take five minutes out on google to see what stinks and what doesn't.

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/58136.html?thread=225497880#cmt225497880
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/60355.html?thread=233027779#cmt233027779
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/56714.html?thread=219384970#cmt219384970

that took no effort and no time. being a mod means mitigating problem players. that is not "giving up all your free time to play internet detective" that's part of being a responsible mod.

yes it's unreasonable to expect mods to Be All Knowing which means yes players should absolutely bring forth deets when they have it

it makes way more sense to me to spend extra time sorting out problem players from the beginning to save yourself and your playerbase more grievances down the road

I know the person who reported her, they had some receipts but not all, and touched base with the prior mod team as they would have all of it. they agreed to give details to the erku mods if contacted.

Erku mods just shrugged and shot themselves in the foot.

damn shame, nonny

dollars to donuts you did no such thing.

https://images.plurk.com/2jEJlkeiqED8IMI4uUtCvC.jpg

Suck my dick

proof isn't threads on wg of people complaining though. that circles back to my point of "you can't tell how many people are sameanoning or who's just rubbernecking and stirring shit." it gives you the knowledge that this player MIGHT be a problem to keep an eye on her or possibly talk to her ahead of time if she apps and be like "look, it's been brought to my attention that there was some problem behavior in the past. keep this out of my game or you're banned."

you need receipts: screencaps or links to plurks and pastebins. i was a mod years ago. i did preban people. because other players brought tangle evidence. some linked wg threads but others brought the receipts and those i could use.

(for the record, i read through the first link you provided and only skimmed the other two. so if there were links to pastebins and such in those, i missed them. )

if that screencap someone provided is the "proof" they sent, it's no wonder the erku mods aren't taking it seriously.

i'm sure "fellden mods are aware" means they just said "send the details of the ban i assume you did to these rando mods of another game", because again no one has proof harley was banned from fellden.

i can't believe anons are acting like the erku mods are doing something wrong here. y'all act like your assumptions are gospel.

Pretty sure a mod team would take that opportunity to set the record straight, not rubber stamp their approval but sure

Harley was never banned, Jamie is a perfect angel who was never banned from multiple games, we have always been at war with oceania

they didn't give a rubber stamp of approval. they said they'd keep an eye on her, because that's literally all they can do with what you provided.

also, we have proof jamie was banned from those places because either the mods of those places confirmed it, or jamie herself confirmed it.

look, i'm with you that harley is a shithead and i intend to avoid her (not that i think she'll bother with me) but if you want her to actually be removed from the game, you need to do more than what you did in that screencap, period. the mods are not wrong for taking your complaint with a grain of salt because it's based entirely on assumptions with no proof.

Be civil here, nonnies. Leaving this up since anons are providing receipts, but I will freeze if things get hectic. C'mon.

[moans]

Re: da

Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: da