Idk
Rundown:
rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.
Temporary Change: To reduce the strain on Dreamwidth's servers new entries will go up when a post reaches 3,000. Please refrain from spamming so we can stretch these entries for a little longer. We don't need several threads soliciting photo evidence of body parts, and we already know that we only care about yaoi. Failure to comply will only result in deletions and butthurt. "People may notice site slowdown/cache error pages. We're working on fixing. You can help: finish posts at 3k comments, not 5k or more." - Dreamwidth@Twitter
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Concerns?
Temporary Change: To reduce the strain on Dreamwidth's servers new entries will go up when a post reaches 3,000. Please refrain from spamming so we can stretch these entries for a little longer. We don't need several threads soliciting photo evidence of body parts, and we already know that we only care about yaoi. Failure to comply will only result in deletions and butthurt. "People may notice site slowdown/cache error pages. We're working on fixing. You can help: finish posts at 3k comments, not 5k or more." - Dreamwidth@Twitter
Rules:
Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Concerns?
Navigate:
Hey! This is the designated catch-all entry. This is not an invitation to spam to your heart's content. The same rules apply.
LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP
OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS
USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)Hypothetically speaking, you get into a disagreement with someone on plurk and you part ways. The person you fight with defriends you and they have a plurk list of like 150+ people. Their plurk is flocked to friends only. They then make a plurk about the disagreement to their 150+ timeline and you can't see it. You are namedropped to this 150+ timeline in a place where you can't see it or speak back to it. A mutual friend screencaps the friends only plurk of you being spoken about to this 150+ timeline and shares it with you and/or an anon comm of some kind.
Whose privacy has been violated in this?
Is that plurk public or private to begin with?
Is bad behavior better or worse than capping the bad behavior?
Is it acceptable to share the content of that plurk as long as it isn't capped? (e.g., paraphrasing or summarising)
Is the plurker absolved from dealing with the consequences of what they have said by virtue of the plurk being friends locked?
Srsly wondering here.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)the plurker is free to share her assholishness to her group of friends however she wants to
her friends are free to share her assholishness to their friends however they want to
i don't see the deal
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)Do not say anything on the internet you would not say to a persons face.
Even if you have security settings enabled
Even if it's set to "private"
Why people can't get this I'll never understand.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)capping is rude and a violation of trust, but...
anyone that thinks anything they post on the internet -- yes, even under a "lock" -- is truly private, they're kidding themselves. your information/posts/anything you put online CAN EASILY BE RETRIVED AND LOOKED AT BY A DOZEN FUCKING PEOPLE AS YOUR DATA IS SENT BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN COMPUTERS EVERY FUCKING WHERE. not to mention all it takes is one of your friends deciding to repost whatever you write for your "privacy" to completely disintegrate. it's not like chatting face to face where all people have is he-said-she-said with nothing concrete to share.
don't ever put anything truly "private" online. don't. something you don't want casually accessible? sure. but nothing is safe online, no matter how illusions of privacy you have.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)People keep putting forth the argument of "Well I shouldn't have to do this! It's bullying!"
It doesn't matter if people shouldn't have to do anything, protect yourself. AND DON'T TALK SHIT ABOUT PEOPLE UNLESS YOU HAVE NO PROBLEM SAYING IT TO THEIR FACE. Because it will get back to them. Never fails.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)No, it's not particularly pleasant to find out that people are laughing at you for acting like a socially inept ass.
But just because they're not filling your heart with warm fuzzies and asspats doesn't mean they're bullying you! Jeeezus christ.
(collective/hypothetical you, not you personally, obviously)
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)thing i don't like/thing that gives me bad feels = bullying
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)you can lock a plurk, but if people see it, ESPECIALLY if it's on a timeline of 100+ people, it's not truly private. when people say nothing is private on the internet, it's true. i like that comparison someone made, about walking in to a party of 100 people and saying something private. you can't expec it to stay private
idk though, idgaf about sharing caps or whatever because my personal philosophy is i don't share a n y t h i n g that i'm not okay owning up to if it comes down to it. same goes for anon
people really need to subscribe to that line of thinking imo
no subject
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)As for whether the bad behavior is better or worse than the invasion of privacy, that really depends on what was said. Everyone has a right to vent without having the entire world see, even if 150 seems like a lot of people (and common sense would suggest that if you don't want something to leak, you'd filter it to a trusted subgroup). If they were lying or trying to rally whiteknights to help bully someone, that may be different.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)More and more it seems like everybody is getting to control everybody else's lives. It fucking sucks.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-10 22:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-11 01:50 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)Talk about some stupid false absolutes and bad analogies all up in there.
Complaining to your plurk list about your job is not comparable to complaining to your plurk list about RP or something going on with another RPer.
If you complained to 100+ coworkers about your job in an inter-office email, whether or not you think your boss has a right to see it, your a completely naive idiot not living in the real world if you expect that they won't find out or that it's unfair to you in they do.
Keep on pretending that the world actually conforms to your totally absurd storybook land where "privacy is privacy" and there's never any gray area of what people are supposed to disclose, anon. Even in professions where privacy is a professional standard it's still not an absolute. You might want to wake up and step out of your dream world sometime in this lifetime.
+1
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)sa
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: sa
(Anonymous) - 2012-04-10 23:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)If you want to complain about your boss, go to walmart and buy a blank book. Write in that and hope no one else finds it. That is the closest you will ever get to private.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-11 03:09 am (UTC)(link)But if they see it, they can use that as motivation to find a legitimate reason to fire you or make your life harder. And your co-worker on plurk can use it to make themselves look good with your boss. Who will you appeal to to uphold that right? You live in a world where companies track your habits and location in order to (at best) devise strategies on how to make you give money to them, where lists of people's names and phone numbers are a black market commodity, and where underaged people post pictures, full names and addresses online willingly. Privacy is a thing of the past.
srsly?
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)they'd have to be brain dead not to expect word to get around.
Real life or the internet, it's going to happen. This isn't hard to understand, guys.
Re: Question re: privacy (yes, more on this topic)
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2012-04-11 04:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2012-04-11 04:08 am (UTC)(link)