rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2019-01-07 07:55 pm

WHAT ANIME

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

Political topics are banned. Report threads and they will be deleted.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

KINKS YOU WANT TO PLAY | PAIRINGS YOU WANT TO PLAY | RECOMMEND A CANON/CHARACTER

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-10 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
i remember that thread on wg and the argument wasn't over the fact they didn't use mash, but that they called mash a useless unit in general gameplay wise.

this fandom argues over gameplay meta all the time, so, not sure what they expected when they make a post like that.

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-10 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
iirc that was the same anon who stubbornly insisted I DON'T NEED STRATEGY I'LL JUST ZERK EVERYTHING and ignored anyone who told them otherwise

some say you can still hear them getting stomped to pieces at nerofest to this very day

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-10 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You definitely needed more than just 'destroy everything in sight' for high difficulty stuff, but people were also insisting that you needed Mash for Nerofes. Which is blatantly untrue.

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-10 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
hey, i'm that anon and i got through nerofest just fine, as it turns out.

guess it's still true what i said in that thread that there's no One True Strat in this game and getting that deeply mad about how other people play a game with zero PVP elements is the most useless waste of energy imaginable in this fandom.

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-11 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
dude, no one's saying there's One True Strat, just that you made a dumbass generalizing claim and people disagreed with you on it.

months later and you're still too hardheaded to get that

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-11 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
idk anon, you were WAY more angry about me not wanting to use mash, and for the record i never told anyone else they shouldn't use her or anything remotely like that, than i was about anything.

maybe examine why that is.

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-11 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
way to assume that it must be only one anon saying anything that goes against your way of thinking

also, you were in a thread talking about her as a character on WG, and then turned it into gameplay meta. if you don’t want people disagreeing with you, then maybe don’t post your opinion on WG of all places?

sa

(Anonymous) 2019-01-11 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
also, to further clarify, i never participated in that WG thread but i remembered it because of the exact same attitude your showing here again

Re: FATE/

(Anonymous) 2019-01-11 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
i'm actually cool with people disagreeing with me. you seem to be really mis-remembering how that thread went down.