i don't care one way or the other about whether or not this game allows nonfandom ocs. that was never what this conversation was about in this thread, or at least not the part i have been part of. (i've kind of lost track of where this is in the comment tree.)
the entire issue at the center of this argument i have been making is whether or not tabletop rpg ocs should count as fandom ocs. i argue that it makes sense to consider them fandom ocs, and have explained my reasons.
the fact the game is based on taz has nothing to do with this. i also think it's silly to not just ban all ocs if they're worried about the concerns they've expressed, but it's not my game so i don't get to decide those things anyway.
either way i've been repeating myself for the last several posts because i wanted to make myself clear, but i think you understand me now and i don't have anything more to add.
Re: dda
the entire issue at the center of this argument i have been making is whether or not tabletop rpg ocs should count as fandom ocs. i argue that it makes sense to consider them fandom ocs, and have explained my reasons.
the fact the game is based on taz has nothing to do with this. i also think it's silly to not just ban all ocs if they're worried about the concerns they've expressed, but it's not my game so i don't get to decide those things anyway.
either way i've been repeating myself for the last several posts because i wanted to make myself clear, but i think you understand me now and i don't have anything more to add.