i mean, i still think it is inconsistent, because if your argument is "well these are different because they're from published/popular works" then that should disqualify *all* OCs from the game, not just tabletop OCs.
if your rule is just "used an established canon for their worldbuilding" then the entire game shouldn't exist because that's exactly what TAZ is.
Re: dda
if your rule is just "used an established canon for their worldbuilding" then the entire game shouldn't exist because that's exactly what TAZ is.
so its inconsistent, either way.