rpanons | Trapped in the city of one loo

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

well, for you to stop throwing around that "omg he loves child predators!!!" tumblr bullshit for one. he's not some cartoon villain rubbing his hands together and cackling as people rape little kids. it's just not true and is a childish way of arguing.

it's like supporting trump's wall and claiming that anyone who doesn't supports rapists.

i'm not saying he loves child predators. i'm saying that his vote was based around the idea of protecting their rights. because that's what it was. i don't really see how you can argue anything differently. he was worried about the sentencing provisions in the bill overstepping their boundaries. and don't get me wrong, i understand the mindset behind wanting to do your best to uphold the constitution when you're in congress like that. but when you prioritize that over putting out an amber alert? that's when i side-eye you. that's not a good decision. that's the wrong priority and the wrong stance to take. and before you even say it, "slippery slope" is a logical fallacy.

and btw i find it incredibly hypocritical of you accusing me of covering my ears tumblr style while completely ignoring the entire rest of my comment. it's not just the amber alert bill that i raise issue with wrt bernie sanders. and in addition to all that other shit, i'm really annoyed with the hypocrisy of his campaign now saying that their path to the nomination is to win over superdelegates, which they've spent the past like 10 months railing against. so, superdelegates are only okay when they vote for him? but when hillary uses them she's an establishment whore? what the hell kind of double standard is that?

he's not perfect. that was the point i was trying to make in my original comment. he's not OMG THE FUCKING WORST WHO HATES CHILDREN AND WANTS TO SEE THEM ALL KIDNAPPED, but he's definitely not the best thing since sliced bread. he has very real flaws, just like hillary does, and that's okay. i just think it's stupid to tear the other candidate down, regardless of who you support, knowing that your candidate ain't smelling like roses, either.

nobody said he was perfect and the best thing since sliced bread. some of us just like him more than hillary.

jfc, thanks for proving my fucking point, you squalling infant.

oh please. there's an anon upthread talking about hillary's iraq vote as though bernie sanders never made a bad decision either. you don't have to say the actual words "he's the perfect candidate" to get your message across.

the only one squalling here is you. you literally came into this thread to defend bernie's amber alert vote, and now you're calling me names for pointing out that it's a fucked up priority to have.

no, they were talking about one vote.

how you got "bernie is never wrong ever" out of "at least he didn't vote for the iraq war" is a question for the ages.

the implication is pretty clear tho

no... it's really not

keep fucking that chicken with those goalposts

but seriously did you even have a point? what was your point, other than bernie's amber alert vote was justified? what point did anon even prove idgi

Trapped in the city of one loo

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

da

dda

no subject