rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-03-14 03:22 pm

Trapped in the city of one loo

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

da

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
well not really. she's not an ex-templar. she doesn't even leave the seekers, technically. so. it's wrong to include her in that sort of grouping.

dda

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
so use their hmd like a person with social awareness

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 08:16 am (UTC)(link)
it was literally just a turn of phrase, dude. anyone who has played the game knows that and also knows that the seekers and templars go hand in hand.

seriously, don't treat someone like an idiot just because they're not as overly specific as you'd like.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not treating anyone like an idiot, just literally pointing out a fact. she's not an ex-templar, anyone who's played the game knows that. i'm not mad about it either, before that gets thrown around. likely just a mistake, but own up to it, and don't call it a turn of phrase because it's...not that.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
But they don't owe you anything lmao you are so fucking entitled. Turn of phrase or mistake, they don't need to apologize and "own up to it"

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)
implying that op doesn't know a simple fact of the game like "cassandra isn't a templar" just because they listed her with ex-templars is treating op like an idiot

how about "fellow warriors who fought for the chantry until they became disillusioned enough with it to leave and figure out alternative ways to serve the maker, if at all"? is that specific enough for you or should i lay it out more plainly? seriously, the phrase ex-templar is fine here for something that's more of an intricate issue in the context of the canon

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-18 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Except it's not, because she's not an ex-Templar.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-03-18 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
omfg why are you so upset about this? this is the dumbest argument ever.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-19 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
you are... bizarre

and obviously don't know the canon as well as you think you do if you keep insisting this. holy crap.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-19 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
I know it better than you apparently.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-03-19 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
omg

da

(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
you evidently don't know canon. seekers are not templars. they don't take lyrium, they're not part of the order. they're completely separate and autonomous. they're both under the purview of the chantry, they're both warrior orders with weird abilities, and when the templars fuck up, the chantry sends in the seekers. that's the extent of the similarities. cass has a whole conversation about it with the inquisitor. perhaps it would behoove you to play the game again to hear it.

regardless of whether the argument's stupid, the person pointing out that cass isn't a templar is right. she isn't. she isn't even an ex-seeker, because if she's not divine, she goes on to rebuild the seekers.

op doesn't owe anyone an apology for the screw up, but her buttbuddies aren't coming off very well either.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
It's like saying that someone who is ex-CIA is ex-FBI.

Sure they're both government organizations but you look stupid for acting like it's the same thing.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-03-20 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh btw she won't rebuild the seekers if the Inquisitor tells her that she shouldn't. Minor detail.